Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041302›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Head-to-Head Comparison of Poxvirus NYVAC and ALVAC Vectors Expressing Identical HIV-1 Clade C Immunogens in Prime-Boost Combination with Env Protein in Nonhuman Primates.

Juan García-Arriaza, Beatriz Perdiguero, Jonathan Heeney, Michael Seaman, David C Montefiori, Celia Labranche, Nicole L Yates, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D Tomaras, Guido Ferrari and 22 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vaccinia-based vaccines to biothreat and emerging viruses.Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Juan García-ArriazaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz PerdigueroDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Jonathan HeeneyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael SeamanDivision of Viral Pathogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David C MontefioriDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Celia LabrancheDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nicole L YatesDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiaoying ShenDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Georgia D TomarasDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Guido FerrariDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kathryn E FouldsVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Adrian McDermottVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Shing-Fen KaoVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mario RoedererVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Natalie HawkinsStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Steve SelfStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jiansheng YaoSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrick FarrellSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sanjay PhogatSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jim TartagliaSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan W BarnettNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian BurkeNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Anthony CristilloAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Kensington, Maryland, USA.
Deborah WeissAdvanced BioScience Laboratories, Inc., Kensington, Maryland, USA.
Carter LeeGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases, San Francisco, California, USA.
Karen KiblerThe Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Bert JacobsThe Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Benedikt AsbachUniversity of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ralf WagnerUniversity of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Song DingEuroVacc Foundation, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giuseppe PantaleoDivision of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mariano EstebanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain mesteban@cnb.csic.es.
Duke University · USSanofi (United States) · USCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USAdvanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) · USArizona State University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Regensburg · DEBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USEurovacc Foundation · CHGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe compared the HIV-1-specific cellular and humoral immune responses elicited in rhesus macaques immunized with two poxvirus vectors (NYVAC and ALVAC) expressing the same HIV-1 antigens from clade C, Env gp140 as a trimeric cell-released protein and a Gag-Pol-Nef polyprotein as Gag-induced virus-like particles (VLPs) (referred to as NYVAC-C and ALVAC-C). The immunization protocol consisted of two doses of the corresponding poxvirus vector plus two doses of a combination of the poxvirus vector and a purified HIV-1 gp120 protein from clade C. This immunogenicity profile was also compared to that elicited by vaccine regimens consisting of two doses of the ALVAC vector expressing HIV-1 antigens from clades B/E (ALVAC-vCP1521) plus two doses of a combination of ALVAC-vCP1521 and HIV-1 gp120 protein from clades B/E (similar to the RV144 trial regimen) or clade C. The results showed that immunization of macaques with NYVAC-C stimulated at different times more potent HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses and induced a trend toward higher-magnitude HIV-1-specific CD8(+) T-cell immune responses than did ALVAC-C. Furthermore, NYVAC-C induced a trend toward higher levels of binding IgG antibodies against clade C HIV-1 gp140, gp120, or murine leukemia virus (MuLV) gp70-scaffolded V1/V2 and toward best cross-clade-binding IgG responses against HIV-1 gp140 from clades A, B, and group M consensus, than did ALVAC-C. Of the linear binding IgG responses, most were directed against the V3 loop in all immunization groups. Additionally, NYVAC-C and ALVAC-C also induced similar levels of HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) responses. Interestingly, binding IgA antibody levels against HIV-1 gp120 or MuLV gp70-scaffolded V1/V2 were absent or very low in all immunization groups. Overall, these results provide a comprehensive survey of the immunogenicity of NYVAC versus ALVAC expressing HIV-1 antigens in nonhuman primates and indicate that NYVAC may represent an alternative candidate to ALVAC in the development of a future HIV-1 vaccine. IMPORTANCE: The finding of a safe and effective HIV/AIDS vaccine immunogen is one of the main research priorities. Here, we generated two poxvirus-based HIV vaccine candidates (NYVAC and ALVAC vectors) expressing the same clade C HIV-1 antigens in separate vectors, and we analyzed in nonhuman primates their immunogenicity profiles. The results showed that immunization with NYVAC-C induced a trend toward higher HIV-1-specific cellular and humoral immune responses than did ALVAC-C, indicating that this new NYVAC vector could be a novel optimized HIV/AIDS vaccine candidate for human clinical trials.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingChick EmbryoGene Products, envGenetic VectorsHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV InfectionsMacaca mulattaPoxviridaePromoter Regions, GeneticVaccines, SyntheticViral Plaque AssayViral VaccinesAIDS VaccinesALVAC vaccineAntibodies, NeutralizingGene Products, envHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensNYVAC-C vaccineVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26041302
PMCPMC4524234
OpenAlexW1573359805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.