Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041264›Full record

ReviewMutation research. Reviews in mutation research

Functional genomic screening approaches in mechanistic toxicology and potential future applications of CRISPR-Cas9.

Hua Shen, Cliona M McHale, Martyn T Smith, Luoping Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hua ShenSuperfund Research Program, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Cliona M McHaleSuperfund Research Program, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Martyn T SmithSuperfund Research Program, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Luoping ZhangSuperfund Research Program, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: luoping@berkeley.edu.
Center for Environmental Health · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES004705 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MCHALE, CLIONA · 1987 to 2025
$74.6M
Biomarkers of Formaldehyde Exposure and ToxicityR01ES017452 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ZHANG, LUOPING · 2009 to 2010
$743k
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004705NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017452NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES017452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing variability in the extent and nature of responses to environmental exposures is a critical aspect of human health risk assessment. Chemical toxicants act by many different mechanisms, however, and the genes involved in adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and AOP networks are not yet characterized. Functional genomic approaches can reveal both toxicity pathways and susceptibility genes, through knockdown or knockout of all non-essential genes in a cell of interest, and identification of genes associated with a toxicity phenotype following toxicant exposure. Screening approaches in yeast and human near-haploid leukemic KBM7 cells have identified roles for genes and pathways involved in response to many toxicants but are limited by partial homology among yeast and human genes and limited relevance to normal diploid cells. RNA interference (RNAi) suppresses mRNA expression level but is limited by off-target effects (OTEs) and incomplete knockdown. The recently developed gene editing approach called clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats-associated nuclease (CRISPR)-Cas9, can precisely knock-out most regions of the genome at the DNA level with fewer OTEs than RNAi, in multiple human cell types, thus overcoming the limitations of the other approaches. It has been used to identify genes involved in the response to chemical and microbial toxicants in several human cell types and could readily be extended to the systematic screening of large numbers of environmental chemicals. CRISPR-Cas9 can also repress and activate gene expression, including that of non-coding RNA, with near-saturation, thus offering the potential to more fully characterize AOPs and AOP networks. Finally, CRISPR-Cas9 can generate complex animal models in which to conduct preclinical toxicity testing at the level of individual genotypes or haplotypes. Therefore, CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful and flexible functional genomic screening approach that can be harnessed to provide unprecedented mechanistic insight in the field of modern toxicology.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEnvironmental ExposureAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndonucleasesGene Regulatory NetworksGene SilencingGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansModels, AnimalBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndonucleasesCRISPR-Cas9Functional genomicsHaploid KBM7 cellsRNAiToxicity testingYeast

Identifiers

PMID26041264
PMCPMC4456615
OpenAlexW2011521013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.