Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26041023›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2015

99m-Technetium binding site in bone marrow mononuclear cells.

Grazielle Dias Suhett, Sergio Augusto Lopes de Souza, Adriana Bastos Carvalho, Rachel de Pinho Rachid, Narcisa Leal da Cunha-E-Silva, Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca, Regina Coeli dos Santos Goldenberg, Bianca Gutfilen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazielle Dias SuhettLaboratório de Cardiologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. grazisuhett@gmail.com.
Sergio Augusto Lopes de SouzaDepartamento de Radiologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Prof. Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 255. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913, Brasil. sergioalsouza@gmail.com.
Adriana Bastos CarvalhoLaboratório de Cardiologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. carvalhoab@gmail.com.
Rachel de Pinho RachidLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Hertha Meyer, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. narcisacunha@gmail.com.
Narcisa Leal da Cunha-E-SilvaLaboratório de Ultraestrutura Celular Hertha Meyer, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. rachel.rachid@yahoo.com.br.
Antonio Carlos Campos de CarvalhoLaboratório de Cardiologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. camposcarvalho@me.com.
Lea Mirian Barbosa da FonsecaDepartamento de Radiologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Prof. Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 255. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913, Brasil. leamirianbf@gmail.com.
Regina Coeli dos Santos GoldenbergLaboratório de Cardiologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brasil. rcsgoldenberg@hotmail.com.
Bianca GutfilenDepartamento de Radiologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Prof. Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 255. Ilha do Fundão, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913, Brasil. bianca.gutfilen@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho · BRFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing interest in 99m-technetium ((99m)Tc)-labeled stem cells encouraged us to study the (99m)Tc binding sites in stem cell compartments.

methodsBone marrow mononuclear cells were collected from femurs and tibia of rats. Cells were labeled with (99m)Tc by a direct method, in which reduced molecules react with (99m)Tc with the use of chelating agents, and lysed carefully in an ultrasonic apparatus. The organelles were separated by means of differential centrifugation. At the end of this procedure, supernatants and pellets were counted, and the percentages of radioactivity (in megabecquerels) bound to the different cellular fractions were determined. Percentages were calculated by dividing the radioactivity in each fraction by total radioactivity in the sample. The pellets were separated and characterized by their morphology on electron microscopy.

resultsThe labeling procedure did not affect viability of bone marrow mononuclear cells. Radioactivity distributions in bone marrow mononuclear cell organelles, obtained in five independent experiments, were approximately 38.5 % in the nuclei-rich fraction, 5.3 % in the mitochondria-rich fraction, 2.2 % in microsomes, and 54 % in the cytosol. Our results showed that most of the radioactivity remained in the cytosol; therefore, this is an intracellular labeling procedure that has ribosomes unbound to membrane and soluble molecules as targets. However, approximately 39 % of the radioactivity remained bound to the nuclei-rich fraction. To confirm that cell disruption and organelle separation were efficient, transmission electron microscopy assays of all pellets were performed.

conclusionsOur results showed that most of the radioactivity was present in the cytosol fraction. More studies to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the cellular uptake of (99m)Tc in bone marrow cells are ongoing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell NucleusCells, CulturedCell SeparationCytosolFemurMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionRatsRats, WistarSodium Pertechnetate Tc 99mTibiaSodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m

Identifiers

PMID26041023
PMCPMC4473842
OpenAlexW1521266241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.