Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26040834›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression.

Lucia L Peixoto, Mathieu E Wimmer, Shane G Poplawski, Jennifer C Tudor, Charles A Kenworthy, Shichong Liu, Keiko Mizuno, Benjamin A Garcia, Nancy R Zhang, K Giese and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. A heritable iron memory enables decision-making inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Distinct Transcriptomic Profiles in the Dorsal Hippocampus and Prelimbic Cortex Are Transiently Regulated following Episodic Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia L Peixoto
Mathieu E Wimmer
Shane G Poplawski
Jennifer C Tudor
Charles A Kenworthy
Shichong Liu
Keiko Mizuno
Benjamin A Garcia
Nancy R Zhang
K Giese
Ted Abel
University of Pennsylvania · USKing's College London · GB

Funding

University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and TeachingK12GM081259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Janis K. Burkhardt · 2007 to 2026
$20.1M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008076 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLENDY, JULIE A · 1985 to 2023
$10.8M
Training in Sleep & Sleep DisordersT32HL007953 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David Menassah Raizen, AMY M SAWYER · 2000 to 2026
$10.6M
Training Program in Neurodevelopmental DisabilitiesT32NS007413 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI AMELIA J EISCH, ERIC D MARSH · 1998 to 2026
$8.9M
Epigenetic Mechanisms of Memory StorageR01MH087463 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ABEL, EDWIN TED G. · 2010 to 2025
$7.8M
Novel Methodology for Quantitative High-throughput Cancer EpigeneticsDP2OD007447 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GARCIA, BENJAMIN A · 2010 to 2010
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL007953NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM081259NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008076NIH HHS DP2 OD007447NIH HHS DP2OD007447NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087463NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007413NINDS NIH HHS T32NS007413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fundamental question in neuroscience is how memories are stored and retrieved in the brain. Long-term memory formation requires transcription, translation and epigenetic processes that control gene expression. Thus, characterizing genome-wide the transcriptional changes that occur after memory acquisition and retrieval is of broad interest and importance. Genome-wide technologies are commonly used to interrogate transcriptional changes in discovery-based approaches. Their ability to increase scientific insight beyond traditional candidate gene approaches, however, is usually hindered by batch effects and other sources of unwanted variation, which are particularly hard to control in the study of brain and behavior.

resultsWe examined genome-wide gene expression after contextual conditioning in the mouse hippocampus, a brain region essential for learning and memory, at all the time-points in which inhibiting transcription has been shown to impair memory formation. We show that most of the variance in gene expression is not due to conditioning and that by removing unwanted variance through additional normalization we are able provide novel biological insights. In particular, we show that genes downregulated by memory acquisition and retrieval impact different functions: chromatin assembly and RNA processing, respectively. Levels of histone 2A variant H2AB are reduced only following acquisition, a finding we confirmed using quantitative proteomics. On the other hand, splicing factor Rbfox1 and NMDA receptor-dependent microRNA miR-219 are only downregulated after retrieval, accompanied by an increase in protein levels of miR-219 target CAMKIIγ.

conclusionsWe provide a thorough characterization of coding and non-coding gene expression during long-term memory formation. We demonstrate that unwanted variance dominates the signal in transcriptional studies of learning and memory and introduce the removal of unwanted variance through normalization as a necessary step for the analysis of genome-wide transcriptional studies in the context of brain and behavior. We show for the first time that histone variants are downregulated after memory acquisition, and splicing factors and microRNAs after memory retrieval. Our results provide mechanistic insights into the molecular basis of cognition by highlighting the differential involvement of epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone variants and post-transcriptional RNA regulation, after acquisition and retrieval of memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Conditioning, PsychologicalEpigenesis, GeneticGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHippocampusHistonesMaleMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroRNAsRNA-Binding ProteinsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2HistonesMicroRNAsRbfox1 protein, mouseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID26040834
PMCPMC4460846
OpenAlexW1530355734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.