Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26040621›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2015

Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Radical Surgery.

Samy M AlGizawy, Hoda H Essa, Badawy M Ahmed

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiation in Colorectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samy M AlGizawyDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, and Department of Surgical Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt samyalgiz@yahoo.com.
Hoda H EssaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, and Department of Surgical Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Badawy M AhmedDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, and Department of Surgical Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Assiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this prospective pilot study was to determine the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with six cycles of FOLFOX 6 (without radiation therapy) followed by radical surgery followed by six additional cycles of FOLFOX 6 for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom January 2010 to January 2014, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in this study. Patients received FOLFOX 6 chemotherapy comprising oxaliplatin and leucovorin calcium i.v. over 2 hours on day 1, then bolus, and then continuous fluorouracil i.v. over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 14 days for 6 courses followed by radical surgery followed by additional 6 cycles of FOLFOX 6.

resultsIn total, 45 patients were enrolled in this study. In the preoperative re-evaluation, the overall response rate was 68.8% (clinical complete response was 4.4%, and the partial response was 64.4%). There were 14 cases (31.2%) of stable disease. No patients had progressive disease. Postoperatively, the pathologic complete response rate was 8 of 45 (17.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9%-28.9%). The median follow-up was 29 months (range 9-54 months). The actuarial 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates for all patients were 80.8% (standard error, 1.877; 95% CI: 69.3%-92.3%) and 67.9% (standard error, 2.319; 95% CI: 54.3%-81.5%), respectively.

conclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) without radiotherapy is active and safe but cannot be considered a standard of care until the results of prospective randomized phase III trials are available. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy of rectal cancer represents the current standard of care. However, its use is also associated with short-term toxicity and long-term morbidity. With the increasing use of total mesorectal resection resulting in better local control and advances in systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, this study highlights the question of whether radiation is a necessary component of neoadjuvant therapy for all patients with rectal cancer or whether select patients could be spared the additional toxicities and inconvenience of radiotherapy. This study suggests that neoadjuvant FOLFOX without radiotherapy is active and safe, but it could not be considered a standard of care till now.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOrganoplatinum CompoundsPostoperative CareProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compounds5-FluorouracilOxaliplatinRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID26040621
PMCPMC4492243
OpenAlexW2341759348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.