Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26040434›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2015

No solution yet for combining two independent studies in the presence of heterogeneity.

Andrea Gonnermann, Theodor Framke, Anika Großhennig, Armin Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Metacognitive beliefs in individuals at risk for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Resistance exercise and breast cancer-related lymphedema-a systematic review update and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. The effect of resistance exercise on strength and safety outcome for people with haemophilia: A systematic review.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Effects of resistance exercise in prostate cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessing the Impact of D-Dimer on Stroke Diagnosis Within 24 h.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea GonnermannInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Theodor FramkeInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Anika GroßhennigInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Armin KochInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicBiostatisticsComputer SimulationDrug ApprovalHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID26040434
PMCPMC4471592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.