ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2015
Self-illuminating quantum dots for non-invasive bioluminescence imaging of mammalian gametes.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the full potential of sperm function with nanotechnology tools.Animal reproduction · 2024Article
- Recent Applications and Future Perspectives of Chemiluminescent and Bioluminescent Imaging Technologies.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2023Review
- Antifungal Nano-Therapy in Veterinary Medicine: Current Status and Future Prospects.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Biocompatible Nanomaterials as an Emerging Technology in Reproductive Health; a Focus on the Male.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- The Current Trends in Using Nanoparticles, Liposomes, and Exosomes for Semen Cryopreservation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Applications of omics and nanotechnology to improve pig embryo production in vitro.Molecular reproduction and development · 2019Review
- Chemiluminescence and Bioluminescence Imaging for Biosensing and Therapy:Theranostics · 2019Review
- Nanotechnology-based approach for safer enrichment of semen with best spermatozoa.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Theranostics Aspects of Various Nanoparticles in Veterinary Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- In-depth proteomic analysis of boar spermatozoa through shotgun and gel-based methods.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Current and future prospects for nanotechnology in animal production.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2017Review
- Surface-initiated ring-opening metathesis polymerization (SI-ROMP) to attach a tethered organic corona onto CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dots.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2016Article
- Bioluminescent magnetic nanoparticles as potential imaging agents for mammalian spermatozoa.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe fertility performance of animals is still a mystery and the full comprehension of mammalian gametes maturation and early embryonic development remains to be elucidated. The recent development in nanotechnology offers a new opportunity for real-time study of reproductive cells in their physiological environments. As a first step toward that goal, we evaluated the effectiveness of a fluorescent and luminescent nanoparticle for in vitro and ex vivo imaging of porcine gametes.
methodsFreshly harvested boar sperm were labeled with red-shifted (655 nm) quantum dot nanoparticles conjugated (QD+) or not (QD-) with plasminogen antibody and evaluated. Subsets of labeled spermatozoa were loaded into straws and placed within the lumen of gilt reproductive tracts for ex vivo intra-uterine imaging. Porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured in the presence of QD- or QD+. Ovarian follicles were microinjected with QD- or QD+ and placed in culture for up to 4 days. After labeling, all samples were supplemented with coelenterazine, the luciferase substrate, and immediately submitted to bioluminescence analysis, followed by fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and P < 0.05 indicated significant differences.
resultsAll labeled-samples revealed bioluminescence emission that was confirmed by fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging of the QD localization within the cells and tissues. Over 76% of spermatozoa and both immature and mature COCs were successfully labeled with QD- or QD+. The QD- fluorescence appeared homogenously distributed in the oocytes, while found in the entire sperm length with a higher accumulation within the mid-piece. Labeled-follicles exhibited a progressive migration of QD nanoparticles within the follicle wall during culture. In contrast, QD+ fluorescence signals appeared condensed and stronger in the follicle cells, sperm head, and sub-plasma membrane area of mature oocytes. Weaker QD+ signals were detected in the cumulus cells. Fluorescence and hyperspectral microscope imaging showed comparable intracellular QD localization. Ex-vivo intra-uterine bioluminescence imaging of labeled spermatozoa revealed stronger signals captured over the oviducts, with uterine body allowing the lowest signal detection.
conclusionFindings indicate that conjugated and non-conjugated fluorescent nanoparticles can be used for effective labeling of mammalian gametes for in vitro monitoring and potential in vivo targeted-imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.