ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2015
The Value of Patient Reported Outcomes and Other Patient-Generated Health Data in Clinical Hematology.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Self-reported health and survival in older patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2020Article
- Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2020Review
- Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Early experiences with patient generated health data: health system and patient perspectives.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Creating Consumer-Generated Health Data: Interviews and a Pilot Trial Exploring How and Why Patients Engage.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Using PROMIS® to create clinically meaningful profiles of nephrotic syndrome patients.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019Article
- Present and Future Trends in Consumer Health Informatics and Patient-Generated Health Data.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Value Based Care and Patient-Centered Care: Divergent or Complementary?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With cures and long-term survival rates increasing in hematologic malignancies, increased focus has been placed on gaining a better understanding of the patient experience from disease and treatment effects. This has been the basis for the utilization of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and other patient-generated health data (PGHD) in efforts to improve long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This review will summarize the impact PROs have had on the evolving standard of care for patients with hematologic malignant conditions and will conclude with a template for the integration of PRO and PGHD to enhance the patient experience, using stem cell transplantation as an example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26040262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.