Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26040249›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2016

Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Wendy J Cannan, David S Pederson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 472 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy J CannanDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
David S PedersonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
University of Vermont · US

Funding

SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY OF THE BER OXIDATIVE DNA GLYCOSYLASESP01CA098993 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI LEE, ANDREA J · 2004 to 2021
$25.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098993NCI NIH HHS P01-CA098993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All organisms suffer double-strand breaks (DSBs) in their DNA as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs can also form when replication forks encounter DNA lesions or repair intermediates. The processing and repair of DSBs can lead to mutations, loss of heterozygosity, and chromosome rearrangements that result in cell death or cancer. The most common pathway used to repair DSBs in metazoans (non-homologous DNA end joining) is more commonly mutagenic than the alternative pathway (homologous recombination mediated repair). Thus, factors that influence the choice of pathways used DSB repair can affect an individual's mutation burden and risk of cancer. This review describes radiological, chemical, and biological mechanisms that generate DSBs, and discusses the impact of such variables as DSB etiology, cell type, cell cycle, and chromatin structure on the yield, distribution, and processing of DSBs. The final section focuses on nucleosome-specific mechanisms that influence DSB production, and the possible relationship between higher order chromosome coiling and chromosome shattering (chromothripsis).

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedRadiation, IonizingAnimalsCell CycleChromatinDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID26040249
PMCPMC4994891
OpenAlexW1783508367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.