ArticleJournal of community genetics2015
Genomic analysis in the clinic: benefits and challenges for health care professionals and patients in Brazil.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The implementation of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in a Brazilian Public Hospital: a systematic review of challenges and perspectives in oncology.BMC medical genomics · 2026Pooled it
- The role of the Latin American Professional Society of Genetic Counseling (SPLAGen): Advancing genetic counseling in Latin America.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Importance of genetic cancer risk assessment as a strategy to stratify risk and provide precision prevention in high-risk patients and families.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Assessment of medical knowledge toward genetic testing for individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Brazil.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Familial history and prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 pathogenic variants in HBOC Brazilian patients from a public healthcare service.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Precision Medicine for Lysosomal Disorders.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Diagnosis of Mucopolysaccharidoses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- 'Omics Approaches to Explore the Breast Cancer Landscape.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019Review
- Fostering caring relationships: Suggestions to rethink liberal perspectives on the ethics of newborn screening.Bioethics · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic diseases in the last two decades, there is still a significant proportion where a causative mutation cannot be identified and a definitive genetic diagnosis remains elusive. New genome-wide or high-throughput multiple gene tests have brought new hope to the field, since they can offer fast, cost-effective and comprehensive analysis of genetic variation. This is particularly interesting in disorders with high genetic heterogeneity. There are, however, limitations and concerns regarding the implementation of genomic analysis in everyday clinical practice, including some particular to emerging and developing economies, as Brazil. They include the limited number of actionable genetic variants known to date, difficulties in determining the clinical validity and utility of novel variants, growth of direct-to-consumer genetic testing using a genomic approach and lack of proper training of health care professionals to adequately request, interpret and use genetic information. Despite all these concerns and limitations, the availability of genomic tests has grown at an extremely rapid pace and commercially available services include initiatives in almost all areas of clinical genetics, including newborn and carrier screening. We discuss the benefits and limitations of genomic testing, as well as the ethical implications and the challenges for genetic education and enough available and qualified health care professionals, to ensure the adequate process of informed consent, meaningful interpretation and use of genomic data and definition of a clear regulatory framework in the particular context of Brazil.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.