ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Rethinking evolutionary individuality.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two kinds of evolutionary individuals: the concept of common interest as an evolutionary foundation of dualism on biological individuality.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2026Article
- Do concepts of individuality account for individuation practices in studies of host-parasite systems? A modeling account of biological individuality.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2024Article
- Metabolic compatibility and the rarity of prokaryote endosymbioses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Microbiota manipulation through the secretion of effector proteins is fundamental to the wealth of lifestyles in the fungal kingdom.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
- Three faces of biofilms: a microbial lifestyle, a nascent multicellular organism, and an incubator for diversity.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2021Review
- Multilevel selection favors fragmentation modes that maintain cooperative interactions in multispecies communities.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Coniochaeta fungus benefits from its intracellular bacteria to form biofilm and defend against other fungi.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- The Interactive Construction of Biological Individuality Through Biotic Entrenchment.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2018Article
- Processes and patterns of interaction as units of selection: An introduction to ITSNTS thinking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Microbial Dark Matter Investigations: How Microbial Studies Transform Biological Knowledge and Empirically Sketch a Logic of Scientific Discovery.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Modeling the Role of the Microbiome in Evolution.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Probiotics: A Promising Role in Dental Health.Dentistry journal · 2017Review
- Synergistic cooperation promotes multicellular performance and unicellular free-rider persistence.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Network-Thinking: Graphs to Analyze Microbial Complexity and Evolution.Trends in microbiology · 2016Review
- Article
- Symbiosis becoming permanent: Survival of the luckiest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper considers whether multispecies biofilms are evolutionary individuals. Numerous multispecies biofilms have characteristics associated with individuality, such as internal integrity, division of labor, coordination among parts, and heritable adaptive traits. However, such multispecies biofilms often fail standard reproductive criteria for individuality: they lack reproductive bottlenecks, are comprised of multiple species, do not form unified reproductive lineages, and fail to have a significant division of reproductive labor among their parts. If such biofilms are good candidates for evolutionary individuals, then evolutionary individuality is achieved through other means than frequently cited reproductive processes. The case of multispecies biofilms suggests that standard reproductive requirements placed on individuality should be reconsidered. More generally, the case of multispecies biofilms indicates that accounts of individuality that focus on single-species eukaryotes are too restrictive and that a pluralistic and open-ended account of evolutionary individuality is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.