Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Combination of Autoantibody Signature with PSA Level Enables a Highly Accurate Blood-Based Differentiation of Prostate Cancer Patients from Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Petra Leidinger, Andreas Keller, Lisa Milchram, Christian Harz, Martin Hart, Angelika Werth, Hans-Peter Lenhof, Andreas Weinhäusel, Bastian Keck, Bernd Wullich and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Liquid Biopsy Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Petra LeidingerDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical School, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Andreas KellerChair for Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E.2.1, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Lisa MilchramAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Health & Environment Department, 1220 Wien, Austria.
Christian HarzDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical School, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Martin HartDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical School, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Angelika WerthMedical Practice of Urology, 66877 Ramstein-Miesenbach, Germany.
Hans-Peter LenhofCenter for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Building E.1.1, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Andreas WeinhäuselAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Health & Environment Department, 1220 Wien, Austria.
Bastian KeckUniversity Clinic of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Bernd WullichUniversity Clinic of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Nicole LudwigDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical School, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Eckart MeeseDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical School, Saarland University, Building 60, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although an increased level of the prostate-specific antigen can be an indication for prostate cancer, other reasons often lead to a high rate of false positive results. Therefore, an additional serological screening of autoantibodies in patients' sera could improve the detection of prostate cancer. We performed protein macroarray screening with sera from 49 prostate cancer patients, 70 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and 28 healthy controls and compared the autoimmune response in those groups. We were able to distinguish prostate cancer patients from normal controls with an accuracy of 83.2%, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia from normal controls with an accuracy of 86.0% and prostate cancer patients from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with an accuracy of 70.3%. Combining seroreactivity pattern with a PSA level of higher than 4.0 ng/ml this classification could be improved to an accuracy of 84.1%. For selected proteins we were able to confirm the differential expression by using luminex on 84 samples. We provide a minimally invasive serological method to reduce false positive results in detection of prostate cancer and according to PSA screening to distinguish men with prostate cancer from men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveAutoantibodiesCase-Control StudiesClone CellsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID26039628
PMCPMC4454546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.