Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals Dynamics of CREB Transcription Factor Bound to Its Target Sequence.

Noriyuki Sugo, Masatoshi Morimatsu, Yoshiyuki Arai, Yoshinori Kousoku, Aya Ohkuni, Taishin Nomura, Toshio Yanagida, Nobuhiko Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transcription Factor Dynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. How p53 Molecules Solve the Target DNA Search Problem: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromatin reprogramming in breast cancer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2018
    Review
  16. Dynamic enhancer function in the chromatin context.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noriyuki SugoGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Masatoshi MorimatsuGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiyuki AraiGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinori KousokuGraduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Aya OhkuniGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Taishin NomuraGraduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Toshio Yanagida1] Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan [2] Riken Quantitative Biological Center (QBic), Osaka, Japan.
Nobuhiko YamamotoGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JPUbe Frontier University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper spatiotemporal gene expression is achieved by selective DNA binding of transcription factors in the genome. The most intriguing question is how dynamic interactions between transcription factors and their target sites contribute to gene regulation by recruiting the basal transcriptional machinery. Here we demonstrate individual binding and dissociation events of the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), both in vitro and in living cells, using single-molecule imaging. Fluorescent-tagged CREB bound to its target sequence cAMP-response element (CRE) for a remarkably longer period (dissociation rate constant: 0.21 s(-1)) than to an unrelated sequence (2.74 s(-1)). Moreover, CREB resided at restricted positions in the living cell nucleus for a comparable period. These results suggest that CREB stimulates transcription by binding transiently to CRE in the time range of several seconds.

Indexed as

Binding SitesMolecular ImagingResponse ElementsAnimalsCell LineCell NucleusCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinGene Expression RegulationHumansMiceProtein BindingCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID26039515
PMCPMC4454023
OpenAlexW595677928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.