Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039462›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Disruption of parenting behaviors in california mice, a monogamous rodent species, by endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Sarah A Johnson, Angela B Javurek, Michele S Painter, Michael P Peritore, Mark R Ellersieck, R Michael Roberts, Cheryl S Rosenfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bisphenol A and bisphenol S disruptions of the mouse placenta and potential effects on the placenta-brain axis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Environmental risk assessment of psychoactive drugs in the aquatic environment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A JohnsonBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
Angela B JavurekBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
Michele S PainterBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
Michael P PeritoreBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
Mark R EllersieckAgriculture Experimental Station-Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
R Michael RobertsBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Genetics Area Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
Cheryl S RosenfeldBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America; Genetics Area Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States of America.
University of Missouri · USExperimental Station · US

Funding

Effects of Bisphenol A on Maternal and Paternal Behaviors of California MiceR21ES023150 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROSENFELD, CHERYL SUSAN · 2014 to 2015
$397k
NIEHS NIH HHS 5R21ES023150-02NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES023150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature and extent of care received by an infant can affect social, emotional and cognitive development, features that endure into adulthood. Here we employed the monogamous, California mouse (Peromyscus californicus), a species, like the human, where both parents invest in offspring care, to determine whether early exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC: bisphenol A, BPA; ethinyl estradiol, EE) of one or both parents altered their behaviors towards their pups. Females exposed to either compound spent less time nursing, grooming and being associated with their pups than controls, although there was little consequence on their weight gain. Care of pups by males was less affected by exposure to BPA and EE, but control, non-exposed females appeared able to "sense" a male partner previously exposed to either compound and, as a consequence, reduced their own parental investment in offspring from such pairings. The data emphasize the potential vulnerability of pups born to parents that had been exposed during their own early development to EDC, and that effects on the male, although subtle, also have consequences on overall parental care due to lack of full acceptance of the male by the female partner.

Indexed as

Pair BondParentingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleHumansMaleMicePeromyscusEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

PMID26039462
PMCPMC4454565
OpenAlexW1552775957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.