Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039355›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Treatment Satisfaction and Well-Being in Patients with Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization Treated with Ranibizumab in the REPAIR Study.

Winfried M Amoaku, Richard P Gale, Andrew J Lotery, Geeta Menon, Sobha Sivaprasad, Jennifer Petrillo, Jennifer Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Italian Patient Satisfaction with wAMD Management: SWAN Study Results.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Clinical Effect of Tongmai Fuming Decoction on Neovascular Ophthalmopathy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Winfried M AmoakuUniversity of Nottingham, Academic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Richard P GaleYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom.
Andrew J LoteryClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Geeta MenonFrimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer PetrilloNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Jennifer QuinnNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV) Secondary to Pathological Myopia (PM): an Individualized Regimen (REPAIR) trial was a prospective study exploring the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg using an individualized treatment regimen over 12 months. The current study investigated the impact of treatment with ranibizumab as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) on individuals with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the REPAIR study, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for treatment satisfaction and well-being. This study included 65 adults with mCNV and a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score of 24-78 in the study eye. Patients completed the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ) at months 1, 6 and 12, and the 12-item Well-Being Questionnaire (W-BQ12) at baseline and months 1, 6 and 12. Subgroup analyses investigated the relationship between PROM scores and treatment in the better- or worse-seeing eye (BSE/WSE), number of injections received, baseline BCVA, BCVA improvement and age. Pearson correlations between change in BCVA, MacTSQ scores and W-BQ12 scores were calculated. The main outcome measures were treatment satisfaction measured with the MacTSQ (score 0-72) and well-being measured with the W-BQ12 (score 0-36). Treatment satisfaction significantly increased over the study period (p = 0.0001). Mean MacTSQ scores increased by 9.7 and 10.0 in patients treated in their WSE and BSE, respectively. Treatment satisfaction was highest in individuals receiving only one injection at month 1; however, by month 12, scores were similar across injection subgroups. Patients aged 68 years or older had the highest MacTSQ scores. Well-being scores also significantly increased over the study period (p = 0.03). Mean W-BQ12 scores increased by 1.7 in patients treated in their WSE and by 2.1 in patients treated in their BSE. Individuals aged 40 years or younger had the greatest increases in general well-being. Patients who experienced stable or improved BCVA at month 12 had greater increases in W-BQ12 scores than those who experienced a decrease. Correlations between BCVA, MacTSQ scores and W-BQ12 scores were largely non-significant. In conclusion, treatment satisfaction and well-being increased during treatment with ranibizumab PRN. Although directly comparable data are limited for the MacTSQ and W-BQ12 in mCNV, these results complement PROM outcomes reported in related studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsChoroidal NeovascularizationFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedMyopia, DegenerativePatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRanibizumabSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID26039355
PMCPMC4454435
OpenAlexW658832364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.