Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039318›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2015

Changes in muscle and fat mass with haemodialysis detected by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis.

K Panorchan, A Nongnuch, S El-Kateb, C Goodlad, A Davenport

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subclinical congestion assessed by whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis in HFrEF outpatients.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Hand Grip Strength Index, a Novel Tool in Risk-Assessing Multi-Ethnic End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients Treated by Haemodialysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K PanorchanBumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
A NongnuchRenal Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3876-9432
S El-KatebUCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
C GoodladUCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
A DavenportUCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBBumrungrad International Hospital · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMulti-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) is becoming more widely used to assess hydration status and body composition in haemodialysis patients. Most centres only measure MFBIA pre dialysis when patients are overhydrated. We wished to determine whether body composition assessments change post dialysis following fluid removal. SUBJECTS/

methodsLean body and fat mass were measured by MFBIA pre and post haemodialysis in 676 stable outpatients.

resultsWeight fell post dialysis from 72.9 ± 17.8 to 70.9 ± 19.9 kg, P<0.001, soft lean mass from 48.2 ± 12.1 to 45.4 ± 11.0 kg and fat-free mass from 51.8 ± 19.2 to 48.1 ± 11.8 kg, P<0.001, whereas percentage body fat (PBF) increased from 28.8 ± 11.9 to 30.8 ± 12.1% post dialysis, P<0.001, with a mean increase post dialysis of 2.0% (95% confidence limits 1.55 to 2.45). There were correlations between the fall in total body water and extracellular water and skeletal muscle mass (r=0.826, P<0.001 and r=0.711, P<0.001, respectively), and negative correlation between the fall in total body water and ICW and the increase in PBF (r=-0.72, P<0.001, and -0.72, P<0.001, respectively). The relative changes were greater for the arms compared with the legs.

conclusionsAlthough more convenient for both patients and staff to undertake bioimpedance measurements pre dialysis, overhydration over estimates muscle mass and under estimates fat. For more reliable and reproducible assessments of nutritional status, we suggest that bioimpedance measurements of body composition should be made when patients are closer to their target weight than when overhydrated.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBody WaterRenal DialysisWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceAdipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropometryBody WeightElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID26039318
OpenAlexW1483101170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.