Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039245›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Androgen Receptor (AR), E-Cadherin, and Ki-67 as Emerging Targets and Novel Prognostic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patients.

Giuseppina Rosaria Rita Ricciardi, Barbara Adamo, Antonio Ieni, Luana Licata, Roberta Cardia, Giuseppa Ferraro, Tindara Franchina, Giovanni Tuccari, Vincenzo Adamo

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fusion of habitat analysis and deep learning on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging for predicting Ki-67 status in pediatric brain tumors.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppina Rosaria Rita RicciardiMedical Oncology Unit AOOR Papardo-Piemonte & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Barbara AdamoOncologia Mèdica Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio IeniDepartment of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Luana LicataDepartment of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Roberta CardiaDepartment of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppa FerraroMedical Oncology Unit AOOR Papardo-Piemonte & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Tindara FranchinaMedical Oncology Unit AOOR Papardo-Piemonte & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giovanni TuccariDepartment of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Vincenzo AdamoMedical Oncology Unit AOOR Papardo-Piemonte & Department of Human Pathology University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTNBC is an aggressive subset of breast cancer (BC) without specific target therapy.

methodsThis observational, retrospective study included 45 cases of TNBC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of the AR, E-cadherin and Ki-67 in relation to histological type, time to relapse and overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples obtained from patients defined TNBC.

resultsThe AR was positive (IHC >10%) in 26.6%. E-cadherin (CDH1) expression was considered positive if the score was ≥ 2. This expression was negative in 53.3% cases. The Ki-67 index was ≥ 20% in 37.7%. Univariate analyses showed that AR, CDH1 and Ki-67 are significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis showed that AR and Ki-67 expression are independent variables associated with OS. The statistical analysis showed that patients with AR negative and Ki-67 positive expression have a significant correlation with poor outcome.

conclusionsOur data suggest that the combination of AR and E-cadherin expression as well as Ki-67 status might be useful prognostic markers in TNBC. Hence, these molecular determinants could play an interesting role to classify subgroups of TNBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCarcinoma, MedullaryFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisAntigens, CDAR protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanKi-67 AntigenReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID26039245
PMCPMC4454487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.