ReviewBone marrow transplantation2015
Umbilical cord blood graft engineering: challenges and opportunities.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gestational diabetes mellitus affects the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in neonatal umbilical cord blood.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Single umbilical cord blood with or without CD34Blood advances · 2017Article
- Article
- Cord blood transplantation: rewind to fast forward.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Review
- Optimal Practices in Unrelated Donor Cord Blood Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017Review
- Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation: Challenges and Future Directions.Stem cells translational medicine · 2017Article
- One or two umbilical cord blood cell units? Caveat emptor.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Review
- Article
- Semi-automated closed system manufacturing of lentivirus gene-modified haematopoietic stem cells for gene therapy.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Cord Blood Cells for Developmental Toxicology and Environmental Health.Frontiers in public health · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We are entering a very exciting era in umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT), where many of the associated formidable challenges may become treatable by ex vivo graft manipulation and/or adoptive immunotherapy utilizing specific cellular products. We envisage the use of double UCBT rather than single UCBT for most patients; this allows for greater ability to treat larger patients as well as to manipulate the graft. Ex vivo expansion and/or fucosylation of one cord will achieve more rapid engraftment, minimize the period of neutropenia and also give certainty that the other cord will provide long-term engraftment/immune reconstitution. The non-expanded (and future dominant) cord could be chosen for characteristics such as better HLA matching to minimize GvHD, or larger cell counts to enable part of the unit to be utilized for the development of specific cellular therapies such as the production of virus-specific T-cells or chimeric-antigen receptor T-cells which are reviewed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.