ArticleBone marrow transplantation2015
The role of donor-derived veto cells in nonmyeloablative haploidentical HSCT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic HSCT offers a route for achieving immune tolerance via mixed chimerism and remains the sole curative option for many nonmalignant, autoimmune and metabolic diseases. Present-day improvements of nonmyeloablative protocols are increasing the safety of HSCT, thereby widening the target population and resurrecting the interest of HSCT application as a platform for tolerance induction in organ transplantation. Using high cell doses of T-cell-depleted (TCD) grafts has been shown to circumvent graft-vs-host disease, leaving graft rejection as the main hindrance due to the robust host immunity that remains after mild conditioning. In this review we highlight the advantages of utilizing unique non-alloreactive 'veto' cells, such as anti-third party central memory CD8 T cells (Tcm), to enable induction of mixed chimerism after megadose HSCT under nonmyeloablative conditioning. Co-administration of HSCT with veto Tcm allows for induction of mixed chimerism that was successfully translated into immune tolerance, as demonstrated by engraftment of donor-type skin grafts. These veto Tcm cells have been shown to specifically eradicate anti-donor host T cells, through lymph-node sequestration and deletion, thus sparing host immunity and circumventing the need for life-long immunosuppression. Hence, data indicate that this treatment modality of combined TCD HSCT and adoptive transfer of Tcm veto cells under nonmyeloablative conditions may serve as a valuable tool for treatment of patients with a wide array of disorders such as hemoglobinopathies, autoimmune diseases and as a prelude for organ tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26039201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.