Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039159›Full record

ReviewPrion2015

Amyloids or prions? That is the question.

Raimon Sabate, Frederic Rousseau, Joost Schymkowitz, Cristina Batlle, Salvador Ventura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prion, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hydration of Simple Model Peptides in Aqueous Osmolyte Solutions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Prions: Roles in Development and Adaptive Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raimon Sabatea Departament de Fisicoquímica ; Facultat de Farmàcia; and Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (IN2UB); Universitat de Barcelona ; Barcelona , Spain ;
Frederic Rousseau
Joost Schymkowitz
Cristina Batlle
Salvador Ventura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major efforts devoted to understanding the phenomenon of prion transmissibility, it is still poorly understood how this property is encoded in the amino acid sequence. In recent years, experimental data on yeast prion domains allow to start at least partially decrypting the sequence requirements of prion formation. These experiments illustrate the need for intrinsically disordered sequence regions enriched with a particularly high proportion of glutamine and asparagine. Bioinformatic analysis suggests that these regions strike a balance between sufficient amyloid nucleation propensity on the one hand and disorder on the other, which ensures availability of the amyloid prone regions but entropically prevents unwanted nucleation and facilitates brittleness required for propagation.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmyloidModels, MolecularPrionsAmino AcidsAmyloidPrionsAD, Alzheimer's diseaseamyloidsCJD, Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseasefALS, familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosisneurodegenerative diseasesPD, Parkinson's diseasePFD, prion forming domainprionsprotein intrinsic disorderQ/N-rich domainsTSE, transmissible spongiform encephalopathyyeast

Identifiers

PMID26039159
PMCPMC4601216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.