Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26039080›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Alters Brain Activity in Regions that Underlie Reward and Taste Perception.

Panayotis K Thanos, Mike Michaelides, Mike Subrize, Mike L Miller, Robert Bellezza, Robert N Cooney, Lorenzo Leggio, Gene-Jack Wang, Ann M Rogers, Nora D Volkow and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical treatment of obesity.F1000Research · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Palatable Hyper-Caloric Foods Impact on Neuronal Plasticity.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Panayotis K ThanosBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Lab, Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Mike MichaelidesDepartment of Neurosciences, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, NY, NY, United States of America.
Mike SubrizeBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Lab, Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Mike L MillerDepartment of Neurosciences, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, NY, NY, United States of America.
Robert BellezzaBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Lab, Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Robert N CooneyDepartment. of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
Lorenzo LeggioSection on Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology, Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Studies, NIAAA, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; Intramural Research Program, NIDA, NIH, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Gene-Jack WangNIAAA Intramural Research Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Ann M RogersDepartment of Surgery, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
Nora D VolkowNIAAA Intramural Research Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Andras HajnalDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
Stony Brook University · USMount Sinai Hospital · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USOffice of Extramural Research · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Substance Abuse and AddictionZIAAA000550 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI VOLKOW, NORA D. · 2009 to 2025
$115.1M
Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology (CPN)ZIAAA000218 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI LEGGIO, LORENZO · 2013 to 2020
$22.8M
Mapping the Genes for Ethanol-Related PhenotypesR01AA011034 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HITZEMANN, ROBERT J. · 1996 to 2014
$5.1M
Gastric bypass surgery alters the regulation of food rewardR01DK080899 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI HAJNAL, ANDRAS · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA 11034NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011034NIDDK NIH HHS DK080899NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is a very effective bariatric procedure to achieve significant and sustained weight loss, yet little is known about the procedure's impact on the brain. This study examined the effects of RYGB on the brain's response to the anticipation of highly palatable versus regular food.

methodsHigh fat diet-induced obese rats underwent RYGB or sham operation and were then tested for conditioned place preference (CPP) for the bacon-paired chamber, relative to the chow-paired chamber. After CPP, animals were placed in either chamber without the food stimulus, and brain-glucose metabolism (BGluM) was measured using positron emission tomography (μPET).

resultsBacon CPP was only observed in RYGB rats that had stable weight loss following surgery. BGluM assessment revealed that RYGB selectively activated regions of the right and midline cerebellum (Lob 8) involved in subjective processes related to reward or expectation. Also, bacon anticipation led to significant activation in the medial parabrachial nuclei (important in gustatory processing) and dorsomedial tegmental area (key to reward, motivation, cognition and addiction) in RYGB rats; and activation in the retrosplenial cortex (default mode network), and the primary visual cortex in control rats.

conclusionsRYGB alters brain activity in areas involved in reward expectation and sensory (taste) processing when anticipating a palatable fatty food. Thus, RYGB may lead to changes in brain activity in regions that process reward and taste-related behaviors. Specific cerebellar regions with altered metabolism following RYGB may help identify novel therapeutic targets for treatment of obesity.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesityTaste PerceptionAnimalsBrainGlucoseMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyGlucose

Identifiers

PMID26039080
PMCPMC4454506
OpenAlexW1539841810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.