Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26038741›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2014

A neonatal gnotobiotic pig model of human enterovirus 71 infection and associated immune responses.

Xingdong Yang, Guohua Li, Ke Wen, Tammy Bui, Fangning Liu, Jacob Kocher, Bernard S Jortner, Marlice Vonck, Kevin Pelzer, Jie Deng and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novel orally infected hamster model for Coxsackievirus A16 hand-foot-and-mouth disease and encephalomyelitis.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2020
    Article
  4. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xingdong YangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Guohua LiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Ke WenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Tammy BuiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Fangning LiuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Jacob KocherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Bernard S JortnerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Marlice VonckDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Kevin PelzerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Jie DengLaboratory of Virology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics , Beijing 100020, China.
Runan ZhuLaboratory of Virology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics , Beijing 100020, China.
Yuyun LiLaboratory of Virology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics , Beijing 100020, China.
Yuan QianLaboratory of Virology, Capital Institute of Pediatrics , Beijing 100020, China.
Lijuan YuanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Blacksburg, VA 24061-0913, USA.
Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USVirginia Tech · USCapital Institute of Pediatrics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine development and pathogenesis studies for human enterovirus 71 are limited by a lack of suitable animal models. Here, we report the development of a novel neonatal gnotobiotic pig model using the non-pig-adapted neurovirulent human enterovirus 71 strain BJ110, which has a C4 genotype. Porcine small intestinal epithelial cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and neural cells were infected in vitro. Oral and combined oral-nasal infection of 5-day-old neonatal gnotobiotic pigs with 5×10(8) fluorescence forming units (FFU) resulted in shedding up to 18 days post-infection, with viral titers in rectal swab samples peaking at 2.22×10(8) viral RNA copies/mL. Viral capsid proteins were detected in enterocytes within the small intestines on post-infection days (PIDs) 7 and 14. Additionally, viral RNA was detected in intestinal and extra-intestinal tissues, including the central nervous system, the lung and cardiac muscle. The infected neonatal gnotobiotic pigs developed fever, forelimb weakness, rapid breathing and some hand, foot and mouth disease symptoms. Flow cytometry analysis revealed increased frequencies of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) IFN-γ-producing T cells in the brain and the blood on PID 14, but reduced frequencies were observed in the lung. Furthermore, high titers of serum virus-neutralizing antibodies were generated in both orally and combined oral-nasally infected pigs on PIDs 7, 14, 21 and 28. Together, these results demonstrate that neonatal gnotobiotic pigs represent a novel animal model for evaluating vaccines for human enterovirus 71 and for understanding the pathogenesis of this virus and the associated immune responses.

Indexed as

adaptive immune responsesanimal modelhuman enterovirus 71neonatal gnotobiotic pigspathogenesisvaccine evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26038741
PMCPMC4051366
OpenAlexW2020312252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.