ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2015
Clinical Presentation, Imaging, and Management of Complications due to Neurointerventional Procedures.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Successful Reperfusion is Associated with Favorable Functional Outcome despite Vessel Perforation during Thrombectomy: A Case Series and Systematic Review.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Pooled it
- Endovascular structures of the basilar artery as forms of the basilar nonfusion spectrum.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unmasking the Imitators: Challenges in Identifying Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion Mimics During Mechanical Thrombectomy.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Article
- Safety and effectiveness of vascular closure devices in interventional radiological procedures.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Article
- What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Comparison of Application Effects of Different Hemostasis Methods After Ischemic Cerebrovascular Intervention.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- A Multifaceted Approach to Optimizing AAV Delivery to the Brain for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Endovascular Stroke Interventions: Procedural Complications and Management.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020Review
- Brain abscess - A rare complication of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.Surgical neurology international · 2020Article
- Carotid cavernous fistula with central retinal artery occlusion and Terson syndrome after mid-facial trauma.GMS ophthalmology cases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurointervention is a rapidly evolving and complex field practiced by clinicians with backgrounds ranging from neurosurgery to radiology, neurology, cardiology, and vascular surgery. New devices, techniques, and clinical applications create exciting opportunities for impacting patient care, but also carry the potential for new iatrogenic injuries. Every step of every neurointerventional procedure carries risk, and a thorough appreciation of potential complications is fundamental to maximizing safety. This article presents the most frequent and dangerous iatrogenic injuries, their presentation, identification, prevention, and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.