Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26038491›Full record

ReviewEmerging microbes & infections2013

Clostridium difficile infection in the twenty-first century.

Chandrabali Ghose

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging microbes & infections, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A Colombian strain ofVirulence · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discrimination between hypervirulent and non-hypervirulent ribotypes of Clostridioides difficile by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and machine learning.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. An Update onToxins · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Gut Dysbiosis andFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandrabali GhoseAaron Diamond AIDS Research Center , New York, NY 10016, USA.
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a spore-forming gram-positive bacillus, and the leading cause of antibiotic-associated nosocomial diarrhea and colitis in the industrialized world. With the emergence of a hypervirulent strain of C. difficile (BI/NAP1/027), the epidemiology of C. difficile infection has rapidly changed in the last decade. C. difficile infection, once thought to be an easy to treat bacterial infection, has evolved into an epidemic that is associated with a high rate of mortality, causing disease in patients thought to be low-risk. In this review, we discuss the changing face of C .difficile infection and the novel treatment and prevention strategies needed to halt this ever growing epidemic.

Indexed as

B1/NAP1/027Clostridium difficilefecal bacteriotherapymonoclonal antibodysporetoxinvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26038491
PMCPMC3820989
OpenAlexW2142600220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.