Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26038406›Full record

ReviewEmerging microbes & infections2012

Plague vaccines: current developments and future perspectives.

Valentina A Feodorova, Vladimir L Motin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging microbes & infections, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial Treatment and Prophylaxis of Plague: Recommendations for Naturally Acquired Infections and Bioterrorism Response.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Zoonoses (Shannon, Ireland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Complete Protection AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomolecules · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Infection and immunity · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina A FeodorovaSaratov Scientific and Research Veterinary Institute of the Russian Academy for Agricultural Sciences, , Saratov 410028, Russian Federation.
Vladimir L MotinUniversity of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.
Saratov Research Center · RUThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many decades of intensive studies of Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, there is no safe and efficient vaccine against this devastating disease. A recently developed F1/V subunit vaccine candidate, which relies mainly on humoral immunity, showed promising results in animal studies; however, its efficacy in humans still has to be carefully evaluated. In addition, those developing next-generation plague vaccines need to pay particular attention to the importance of eliciting cell-mediated immunity. In this review, we analyzed the current progress in developing subunit, DNA and live carrier platforms of delivery by bacterial and viral vectors, as well as approaches for controlled attenuation of virulent strains of Y. pestis.

Indexed as

Plagueprotective antigensvaccineYersinia pestis

Identifiers

PMID26038406
PMCPMC3630923
OpenAlexW1989678097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.