Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26038100›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Opportunities to improve postpartum care for mothers and infants: design of context-specific packages of postpartum interventions in rural districts in four sub-Saharan African countries.

Els Duysburgh, Birgit Kerstens, Seni Kouanda, Charles Paulin Kaboré, Danielle Belemsaga Yugbare, Peter Gichangi, Gibson Masache, Beatrice Crahay, Gilda Gondola Sitefane, Nafissa Bique Osman and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Safe recovery after cesarean in rural Africa: Technical consensus guidelines for post-discharge care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Els DuysburghInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of uro-gynaecology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 P3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. els.duysburgh@ugent.be.
Birgit KerstensInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of uro-gynaecology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 P3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. birgit.kerstens@antwerpen.be.
Seni KouandaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences et de la Santé, P.O. Box 7192, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso. skouanda@irss.bf.
Charles Paulin KaboréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences et de la Santé, P.O. Box 7192, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso. kaborewendyam@yahoo.fr.
Danielle Belemsaga YugbareInstitut de Recherche en Sciences et de la Santé, P.O. Box 7192, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso. belemsagadanielle@yahoo.fr.
Peter GichangiInternational Centre of Reproductive Health Kenya, Obote Avenue - Tudor Estate, P.O. Box 91109, 80103, Mombasa, Kenya. Peter@icrhk.org.
Gibson MasacheParent and Child Health Initiative Trust, P.O. Box 31686, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi. gibsonmasache2012@yahoo.com.
Beatrice CrahayInternational Centre of Reproductive Health Mozambique, Av. Maquiguana, Praceta 1607, Prédio 100, 1 Andar, Maputo, Mozambique. beatrice.crahay@gmail.com.
Gilda Gondola SitefaneInternational Centre of Reproductive Health Mozambique, Av. Maquiguana, Praceta 1607, Prédio 100, 1 Andar, Maputo, Mozambique. gildagondola@gmail.com.
Nafissa Bique OsmanEduardo Mondlane University, Faculdade de Medicina, Av. Salvador Allende 702, Maputo, Mozambique. nafissa.osman@gmail.com.
Severiano FoiaEduardo Mondlane University, Faculdade de Medicina, Av. Salvador Allende 702, Maputo, Mozambique. s_foia@yahoo.com.br.
Henrique BarrosDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. hbarros@med.up.pt.
Sofia Castro LopesDepartment of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. fia.clopes@gmail.com.
Susan MannInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. suemann@doctors.org.uk.
Bejoy NambiarInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. b.nambiar@ucl.ac.uk.
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. t.colbourn@ucl.ac.uk.
Marleen TemmermanInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of uro-gynaecology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 P3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. marleen.temmerman@ugent.be.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum maternal and infant mortality is high in sub-Saharan Africa and improving postpartum care as a strategy to enhance maternal and infant health has been neglected. We describe the design and selection of suitable, context-specific interventions that have the potential to improve postpartum care.

methodsThe study is implemented in rural districts in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique. We used the four steps 'systems thinking' approach to design and select interventions: 1) we conducted a stakeholder analysis to identify and convene stakeholders; 2) we organised stakeholders causal analysis workshops in which the local postpartum situation and challenges and possible interventions were discussed; 3) based on comprehensive needs assessment findings, inputs from the stakeholders and existing knowledge regarding good postpartum care, a list of potential interventions was designed, and; 4) the stakeholders selected and agreed upon final context-specific intervention packages to be implemented to improve postpartum care.

resultsNeeds assessment findings showed that in all study countries maternal, newborn and child health is a national priority but specific policies for postpartum care are weak and there is very little evidence of effective postpartum care implementation. In the study districts few women received postpartum care during the first week after childbirth (25 % in Burkina Faso, 33 % in Kenya, 41 % in Malawi, 40 % in Mozambique). Based on these findings the interventions selected by stakeholders mainly focused on increasing the availability and provision of postpartum services and improving the quality of postpartum care through strengthening postpartum services and care at facility and community level. This includes the introduction of postpartum home visits, strengthening postpartum outreach services, integration of postpartum services for the mother in child immunisation clinics, distribution of postpartum care guidelines among health workers and upgrading postpartum care knowledge and skills through training.

conclusionThere are extensive gaps in availability and provision of postpartum care for mothers and infants. Acknowledging these gaps and involving relevant stakeholders are important to design and select sustainable, context-specific packages of interventions to improve postpartum care.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentAfrica South of the SaharaCommunity Health ServicesCommunity-Institutional RelationsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesPostnatal CarePregnancyRural Population

Identifiers

PMID26038100
PMCPMC4453099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.