Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26038048›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2015

Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically?

D Wagner, C Ossendorf, D Gruszka, A Hofmann, P M Rommens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04744350 (Conservative or Operative Therapy in Patients With a Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04744350 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Conservative or Operative Therapy in Patients With a Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBjörn-Christian LinkRan2022 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsPelvic FractureArmsTreatment of FFP type IIb and IIc
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reported complications after spinopelvic fixation for U-type sacral fractures in older adults: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Imaging of pelvic ring fractures in older adults and its clinical implications-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Sacroiliac versus transiliac-transsacral screw osteosynthesis in osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a biomechanical comparison.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Management of sacral fragility fractures leading to spinopelvic dissociation: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis; what can we tell our patients?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mortality After Iliosacral Screw Fixation for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  20. Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D WagnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany, wagner.daniel@gmx.ch.
C Ossendorf
D Gruszka
A Hofmann
P M Rommens
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS) occurring predominantly in osteoporotic individuals poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinical presentation varies from longstanding low back pain without the patient remembering a traumatic event to immobilized patients after suffering a low-energy trauma. FFS are often combined with a fracture of the anterior pelvic ring; hence they are classified as a part of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). If not displaced, the patients are treated with weight bearing as tolerated and analgesics; however, we advocate to treat displaced fractures surgically according to the fracture personality and the patient's comorbidities. Surgical options include minimal invasive sacro-iliac screws, trans-sacral bar osteosynthesis, open reduction and internal fixation, or spinopelvic stabilization. In the light of the high complication rate associated with immobilized patients, an operative approach often is indicated to accelerate the patient's mobility.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingFractures, SpontaneousHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOsteoporotic FracturesPelvic BonesRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentSacrumTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26038048
PMCPMC4523697
OpenAlexW1978076944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.