ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2016
Damage control laparotomy and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy for complex combined pancreatoduodenal and venous injuries.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resection and reconstruction in high-grade pancreatic head injuries.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy in trauma patients with grade IV-V duodenal or pancreatic injuries: a post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter trial.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor: Management and Outcome of Blunt Pancreatic Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Expedient management of complex grade V pancreaticoduodenal injuries.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Surgical management of high-grade pancreatic injuries: Insights from a high-volume pancreaticobiliary specialty unit.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Feasibility and safety of "bridging" pancreaticogastrostomy for pancreatic trauma in Landrace pigs.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Two-stage pancreatic head resection after previous damage control surgery in trauma: two rare case reports.BMC surgery · 2020Article
- Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Review
- Open abdomen management and outcomes: two case reports from western Kenya and a review of literature from Africa.The Pan African medical journal · 2019Review
- Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal injuries in children.Pediatric surgery international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis single-centre study evaluated the efficacy of damage control surgery and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction in patients who had combined severe pancreatic head and visceral venous injuries.
methodsProspectively recorded data of patients who underwent an initial damage control laparotomy and a subsequent pancreatoduodenectomy for severe pancreatic injuries were evaluated to assess optimal operative sequencing.
resultsDuring the 20-year study period, 312 patients were treated for pancreatic injuries of whom 14 underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy. Six (five men, one woman, median age 20, range 16-39 years) of the 14 patients were in extremis with exsanguinating venous bleeding and non-reconstructable AAST grade 5 pancreatoduodenal injuries and underwent a damage control laparotomy followed by delayed pancreatoduodenectomy and reconstruction when stable. During the initial DCS, the blood loss compared to the subsequent laparotomy and definitive procedure was 5456 ml, range 2318-7665 vs 1250 ml, range 850-3600 ml (p < 0.01). The mean total fluid administered in the operating room was 11,150 ml, range 8450-13,320 vs 6850 ml, range 3350-9020 ml (p < 0.01). The mean operating room time was 113 min, range 90-140 vs 335 min, range 260-395 min (p < 0.01). During the second laparotomy five patients had a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and one a standard Whipple resection. Four of the six patients survived. Two patients died in hospital, one of MOF and coagulopathy and the other of intra-abdominal sepsis and multi-organ failure. Median duration of intensive care was 6 days, (range 1-20 days) and median duration of hospital stay was 29 days, (range 1-94 days).
conclusionDamage control laparotomy and delayed secondary pancreatoduodenectomy is a live-saving procedure in the small cohort of patients who have dire pancreatic and vascular injuries. When used appropriately, the staged resection and reconstruction allows survival in a previously unsalvageable group of patients who have severe physiological derangement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.