ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2016
The role of computed tomography in determining delayed intervention for gunshot wounds through the liver.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective nonoperative versus operative management of liver gunshot injuries: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025Article
- Early CT scanning in the emergency department in patients with penetrating injuries: does it affect outcome?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGunshot wounds through the liver are highly lethal and are prone to delayed morbidity due to late complications.
methodsA retrospective study was performed to determine the incidence, morbidity, and need for late interventions in patients shot through the liver, and the role of post-injury CT in making those determinations.
results83 patients were shot through the liver. Injury grades were: Grade V-12 (14 %), Grade IV-41 (49 %), Grade III-12 (14 %), Grade II-8 (10 %), Grade I-1 (1 %), and nine were ungraded. Ten (12 %) died in the ED, three (4 %) died in the OR, and two (2 %) died postoperatively. Of the 68 survivors, 52 (76 %) had follow-up CT scans performed a median of 7 days (95 % CI 2-13 days) after injury. Seventeen (33 %) had 25 complications related to the bullet tract: 12 (48 %) abscesses, 6 (24 %) infected hematomas, 3 (12 %) bilomas, 3 (12 %) unclassified fluid collections, and 1 (4 %) hepatic necrosis. Treatment included CT-guided drainage in 15 (60 %), ultrasound-guided drainage in 3 (12 %), surgical drainage and debridement in 2 (8 %), and observation in 5 (20 %). Overall morbidity rate including hepatic and non-hepatic complications was 74 % (50/68). Patients having their CT scan-determined intervention (for all complications) within 7 days of injury (n = 24), compared to those having their CT scan-determined intervention on day 8 or later (n = 28), had a significantly decreased rate of overall complications and morbidity (p = 0.03). This difference was due to early detection and intervention for abscesses, anastomotic breakdown, and missed injuries. Those having a CT scan within 7 days of injury also had a significantly reduced length of stay compared to those scanned on day 8 or later (median 14 days, 95 % CI 4-24 days versus 18 days, 95 % CI 6-30 days, p = 0.05).
conclusionsGunshot wounds to the liver have a high morbidity and mortality rate. Survivors should have a follow-up CT scan performed within 7 days to allow detection and intervention for complications, as this dramatically decreases the overall morbidity rate and length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.