Trial reportEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2015
Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.
Trial report in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw for AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3 trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- What patient reported outcome measures are used in clinical trials in hip fracture? A systematic mapping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures (AO type 31-A2): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Cephalomedullary Nails with Sliding Hip Screws in Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness research on proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw in patients with trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A meta-analysis comparing intramedullary with extramedullary fixations for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- [Proximal femoral nails antirotation and dynamic hip screws for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, a meta-analysis.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2018Pooled it
- Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Review
- Intramedullary Nailing vs. Plate Fixation for Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Biomechanical evaluation of the new intramedullary system II for treating reverse obliquity trochanteric fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the use of the Proximal Femoral Nail - Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw for Stable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures-Stable Trochanteric Fractures Intramedullary versus Extramedullary (STRIVE) Study.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparing Intramedullary Nails versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Clinical Outcome of the Oblique Locking Hip Screw.Advances in orthopedics · 2025Article
- Is the Timing of Surgery a Sufficient Predictive Factor for Outcomes in Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures? A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWe sought to determine whether intramedullary fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation produces comparable outcomes to dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients were randomly allocated to receive proximal femoral nail antirotation (Group 1, n = 96, mean age; 77.22 ± 6.82 years) or dynamic hip screw (Group 2, n = 102, mean age; 76.86 ± 6.74 years). Outcome measures were time of operation and fluoroscopy, amount of blood loss and occurrence of surgery-related complications. Tip-apex distance and femoral neck shortening were also evaluated. Patients were evaluated at the sixth month to assess the recovery of walking ability. Survival information was obtained from a civil registry.
resultsOperative and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter and blood loss was significantly lower in Group 1 than those in Group 2. Complication rates, mean tip-apex indices and recovery of walking ability were similar between groups, whereas independent walking was more common in Group 1 than in Group 2. Until the sixth month, screw cutout occurred in eight (7.8%) and seven (7.3%) patients in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.88). Three-year survival rate was 61.6 ± 9.4 vs 57.3 ± 9.7 % in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.50).
conclusionProximal femoral nail antirotation technique offers better recovery than dynamic hip screw, whereas both techniques possess the same risk of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.