Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26037892›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2015

Alpha-enolase is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Nicole M White-Al Habeeb, Ashley Di Meo, Andreas Scorilas, Fabio Rotondo, Olena Masui, Annetta Seivwright, Manal Gabril, Andrew H A Girgis, Michael A Jewett, George M Yousef

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The regulatory roles and clinical significance of glycolysis in tumor.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicole M White-Al HabeebDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, nmawhite@gmail.com.
Ashley Di Meo
Andreas Scorilas
Fabio Rotondo
Olena Masui
Annetta Seivwright
Manal Gabril
Andrew H A Girgis
Michael A Jewett
George M Yousef
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CANational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRWestern University of Health Sciences · USYork University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 119606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an aggressive disease with unpredictable behaviour. Clinical parameters are not always accurate for prognosis prediction. The integration of molecular markers to prognostic models can significantly improve prognostic assessment and consequently patient management. We assessed the expression of alpha-enolase (ENO1) protein by immunohistochemistry in 360 patients with primary ccRCC and correlated its expression with multiple clinicopathological parameters including stage, grade, tumor size, disease-free and overall survival. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for clinicopathological factors were used to test for a link between ENO1 expression and both disease-free and overall survival. We correlated ENO1 mRNA expression with overall survival in an independent set of 428 ccRCC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas. ENO1 showed cytoplasmic, membranous and nuclear staining patterns. There is a statistically significant negative correlation between ENO1 expression, tumor stage, and grade. ENO1 expression also shows a statistically significant direct correlation with disease-free survival (p = 0.011) and overall survival (p = 0.030) in ccRCC. Patients with higher ENO1 expression had lower hazard ratio of recurrence, although this was not statistically significant (HR = 0.330, p = 0.060). These findings were validated at the mRNA level in an independent set of 428 ccRCC cases which also showed that low ENO1 expression is associated with significantly shorter overall survival. Down-regulation of ENO1 can be a predictor of poor prognosis in ccRCC, and it can be a potential prognostic marker.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCohort StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesKidney NeoplasmsMicroRNAsNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPhosphopyruvate HydratasePrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsENO1 protein, humanMicroRNAsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseRNA, MessengerTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26037892
OpenAlexW623039274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.