Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26037801›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2016

Using human brain imaging studies as a guide toward animal models of schizophrenia.

S S Bolkan, F Carvalho Poyraz, C Kellendonk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Organization of afferents to the orbitofrontal cortex in the rat.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A momentary biomarker for depressive mood.In silico pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S S BolkanDepartment of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division of Molecular Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
F Carvalho PoyrazDepartment of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division of Molecular Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
C KellendonkDepartment of Pharmacology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division of Molecular Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: ck491@columbia.edu.

Funding

Dopamine Dysfunction in SchizophreniaP50MH086404 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI ABI-DARGHAM, ANISSA · 2010 to 2014
$9.4M
Medium Spiny Neuron Excitability and MotivationR01MH093672 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI KELLENDONK, CHRISTOPH · 2011 to 2020
$5.0M
ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN NEUROBIOLOGY & BEHAVIORT32NS064928 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HENGST, ULRICH · 2010 to 2024
$3.0M
Optogenetic dissection of thalamo-prefontal circuitry supporting working memoryF31MH102041 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BOLKAN, SCOTT STEVEN · 2014 to 2015
$86k
NIMH NIH HHS 1F31MH102041NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH102041NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH086404NIMH NIH HHS P50MH086404NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093672NIMH NIH HHS R01MH093672NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous and poorly understood mental disorder that is presently defined solely by its behavioral symptoms. Advances in genetic, epidemiological and brain imaging techniques in the past half century, however, have significantly advanced our understanding of the underlying biology of the disorder. In spite of these advances clinical research remains limited in its power to establish the causal relationships that link etiology with pathophysiology and symptoms. In this context, animal models provide an important tool for causally testing hypotheses about biological processes postulated to be disrupted in the disorder. While animal models can exploit a variety of entry points toward the study of schizophrenia, here we describe an approach that seeks to closely approximate functional alterations observed with brain imaging techniques in patients. By modeling these intermediate pathophysiological alterations in animals, this approach offers an opportunity to (1) tightly link a single functional brain abnormality with its behavioral consequences, and (2) to determine whether a single pathophysiology can causally produce alterations in other brain areas that have been described in patients. In this review we first summarize a selection of well-replicated biological abnormalities described in the schizophrenia literature. We then provide examples of animal models that were studied in the context of patient imaging findings describing enhanced striatal dopamine D2 receptor function, alterations in thalamo-prefrontal circuit function, and metabolic hyperfunction of the hippocampus. Lastly, we discuss the implications of findings from these animal models for our present understanding of schizophrenia, and consider key unanswered questions for future research in animal models and human patients.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrainHumansMiceReceptors, Dopamine D2SchizophreniaReceptors, Dopamine D2brain imagingdopaminehippocampusschizophreniastriatumthalamo-cortical circuit

Identifiers

PMID26037801
PMCPMC4664583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.