Trial reportAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2015
The Impact of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Initiation on Early Warfarin Dosing.
Trial report in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDosing algorithms for warfarin incorporate clinical and genetic factors but may not account for the numerous comorbidities affecting patients who start warfarin while hospitalized. We aimed to determine whether these algorithms perform differently when warfarin is initiated for inpatients compared with outpatients. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort of 1015 participants from the Clarification of Optimal Anticoagulation through Genetics (COAG) trial who were randomized to either pharmacogenetically or clinically guided warfarin dosing algorithms. Clinicians and participants were blinded to dose during the first 28 days. We compared groups, based on location at the time of the first warfarin dose request, in relation to the following outcomes: percentage of time in the therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (PTTR) during the first 4 weeks, time to first therapeutic INR, time to maintenance dose, and the difference between predicted and observed maintenance doses.
resultsA total of 527 participants started warfarin as inpatients and 488 as outpatients. There was no difference in PTTR based on location: 43.2 % for inpatient versus 47.4 % for outpatient initiation [mean adjusted difference -2.2 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -5.9 to 1.6]. Similarly, there were no differences in time to first therapeutic INR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06; 95 % CI 0.91-1.24] or to maintenance dose (HR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.81-1.14). There was no evidence of interaction between study intervention (pharmacogenetically vs. clinically guided therapy) and location of initiation for these main outcomes. The difference between predicted and observed maintenance doses was similar for both locations.
conclusionThe warfarin dosing algorithms performed similarly for subjects who initiated warfarin as inpatients and outpatients, regardless of whether dosing was pharmacogenetically or clinically guided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.