Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26037536›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

Recent Evolution in Rattus norvegicus Is Shaped by Declining Effective Population Size.

Eva E Deinum, Daniel L Halligan, Rob W Ness, Yao-Hua Zhang, Lin Cong, Jian-Xu Zhang, Peter D Keightley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome analyses suggest recent speciation and postglacial isolation in the Norwegian lemming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva E DeinumInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daniel L HalliganInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rob W NessInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Yao-Hua ZhangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lin CongInstitute of Plant Protection, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Jian-Xu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peter D KeightleyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom peter.keightley@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brown rat, Rattus norvegicus, is both a notorious pest and a frequently used model in biomedical research. By analyzing genome sequences of 12 wild-caught brown rats from their presumed ancestral range in NE China, along with the sequence of a black rat, Rattus rattus, we investigate the selective and demographic forces shaping variation in the genome. We estimate that the recent effective population size (Ne) of this species = [Formula: see text], based on silent site diversity. We compare patterns of diversity in these genomes with patterns in multiple genome sequences of the house mouse (Mus musculus castaneus), which has a much larger Ne. This reveals an important role for variation in the strength of genetic drift in mammalian genome evolution. By a Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent analysis of demographic history, we infer that there has been a recent population size bottleneck in wild rats, which we date to approximately 20,000 years ago. Consistent with this, wild rat populations have experienced an increased flux of mildly deleterious mutations, which segregate at higher frequencies in protein-coding genes and conserved noncoding elements. This leads to negative estimates of the rate of adaptive evolution (α) in proteins and conserved noncoding elements, a result which we discuss in relation to the strongly positive estimates observed in wild house mice. As a consequence of the population bottleneck, wild rats also show a markedly slower decay of linkage disequilibrium with physical distance than wild house mice.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsConserved SequenceDNA, IntergenicExonsGenomeLinkage DisequilibriumMiceMutationOpen Reading FramesPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DensityRatsDNA, Intergenicbottleneckcomparative population genomicsDFE-αdistribution of fitness effectseffective population sizeevolutionary adaptationIllumina whole genome sequencingMus musculus castaneusPSMCRattus norvegicus

Identifiers

PMID26037536
PMCPMC4576703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.