ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2015
Evaluation of differences in carotid intima-media thickness in patients affected by systemic rheumatic diseases.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-Specific Cardiovascular and Platelet Dynamics in Kawasaki Disease.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Peripheral Microangiopathy Changes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Related to Systemic Sclerosis: Data From a Multicenter Observational Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Significant Associations of Neurological Complications of Herpes Zoster With Stroke in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate whether rheumatic autoimmune diseases, systemic sclerosis (SSc) in particular, are associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness (C-IMT). A total of 108 clinical outpatients (93 females), mean age 51 ± 14 years suffering from CTD were consecutively enrolled. Patients were subdivided into the following two groups: (1) Systemic Sclerosis (SSc, 60 patients); (2) non-Systemic Sclerosis (NoSSc, 48 patients). No randomization was managed. All patients underwent structured clinical interview, physical examination, laboratory evaluation and two-dimensional echo-color Doppler of the carotid arteries to measure C-IMT and atherosclerotic plaques. Framingham risk score was also calculated. We also enrolled 108 healthy controls (HC), matched by sex and age. The primary outcome was to stratify cardiovascular risk of CTD patients. There were no significant differences between SSc and NoSSc patients regarding any of the demographics and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Mean C-IMT was not significantly different between the whole CTD patients (0.86 ± 0.13 mm) and HC (0.83 ± 0.13 mm). C-IMT was significantly higher in SSc than in NoSSc group (0.91 ± 0.1 mm vs 0.80 ± 0.14 mm, p < 0.001). Furthermore, C-IMT in SSc group was significantly higher than C-IMT in controls (0.91 ± 0.1 mm vs 0.83 ± 0.13 mm, p < 0.001). C-IMT did correlate neither with disease activity nor with drug intake. SSc patients had a significant increase in C-IMT as compared to NoSSc patients and healthy controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.