Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036992›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2015

Estimation of Genetic Relationships Between Individuals Across Cohorts and Platforms: Application to Childhood Height.

Iryna O Fedko, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Irene Pappa, Catharina E M van Beijsterveldt, Erik A Ehli, Gareth E Davies, Fernando Rivadeneira, Henning Tiemeier, Morris A Swertz and 3 more

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Genome-wide Association Meta-analysis of Childhood and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring internalizing problems: Results from genetic and family-based analyses.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Iryna O FedkoDepartment of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, i.o.fedko@vu.nl.
Jouke-Jan Hottenga
Carolina Medina-Gomez
Irene Pappa
Catharina E M van Beijsterveldt
Erik A Ehli
Gareth E Davies
Fernando Rivadeneira
Henning Tiemeier
Morris A Swertz
Christel M Middeldorp
Meike Bartels
Dorret I Boomsma

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS RC2 2MH08995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining genotype data across cohorts increases power to estimate the heritability due to common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), based on analyzing a Genetic Relationship Matrix (GRM). However, the combination of SNP data across multiple cohorts may lead to stratification, when for example, different genotyping platforms are used. In the current study, we address issues of combining SNP data from different cohorts, the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) and the Generation R (GENR) study. Both cohorts include children of Northern European Dutch background (N = 3102 + 2826, respectively) who were genotyped on different platforms. We explore imputation and phasing as a tool and compare three GRM-building strategies, when data from two cohorts are (1) just combined, (2) pre-combined and cross-platform imputed and (3) cross-platform imputed and post-combined. We test these three strategies with data on childhood height for unrelated individuals (N = 3124, average age 6.7 years) to explore their effect on SNP-heritability estimates and compare results to those obtained from the independent studies. All combination strategies result in SNP-heritability estimates with a standard error smaller than those of the independent studies. We did not observe significant difference in estimates of SNP-heritability based on various cross-platform imputed GRMs. SNP-heritability of childhood height was on average estimated as 0.50 (SE = 0.10). Introducing cohort as a covariate resulted in ≈2 % drop. Principal components (PCs) adjustment resulted in SNP-heritability estimates of about 0.39 (SE = 0.11). Strikingly, we did not find significant difference between cross-platform imputed and combined GRMs. All estimates were significant regardless the use of PCs adjustment. Based on these analyses we conclude that imputation with a reference set helps to increase power to estimate SNP-heritability by combining cohorts of the same ethnicity genotyped on different platforms. However, important factors should be taken into account such as remaining cohort stratification after imputation and/or phenotypic heterogeneity between and within cohorts. Whether one should use imputation, or just combine the genotype data, depends on the number of overlapping SNPs in relation to the total number of genotyped SNPs for both cohorts, and their ability to tag all the genetic variance related to the specific trait of interest.

Indexed as

Body HeightChildCohort StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait, Heritable

Identifiers

PMID26036992
PMCPMC4561077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.