Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036877›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2015

Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction Using Private Insurer Claims Data.

Margaret A Olsen, Katelin B Nickel, Ida K Fox, Julie A Margenthaler, Kelly E Ball, Daniel Mines, Anna E Wallace, Victoria J Fraser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PLGA and PDMS-basedFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret A Olsen1Division of Infectious Diseases,Department of Medicine,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Katelin B Nickel1Division of Infectious Diseases,Department of Medicine,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Ida K Fox3Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,Department of Surgery,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Julie A Margenthaler4Division of General Surgery,Department of Surgery,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Kelly E Ball1Division of Infectious Diseases,Department of Medicine,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Daniel Mines5HealthCore,Inc.,Wilmington,Delaware.
Anna E Wallace5HealthCore,Inc.,Wilmington,Delaware.
Victoria J Fraser1Division of Infectious Diseases,Department of Medicine,Washington University School of Medicine,St. Louis,Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USWilmington University · US

Funding

IMMEDIATE VS DELAYED RECONSTRUCTION AND BREAST CANCER SURGERY COMPLICATIONSR01CA149614 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI OLSEN, MARGARET A · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000162NCEZID CDC HHS U54CK000162NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA149614NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe National Healthcare Safety Network classifies breast operations as clean procedures with an expected 1%-2% surgical site infection (SSI) incidence. We assessed differences in SSI incidence following mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction in a large, geographically diverse population.

designRetrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Commercially insured women aged 18-64 years with ICD-9-CM procedure or CPT-4 codes for mastectomy from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2011

methodsIncident SSIs within 180 days after surgery were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. The incidences of SSI after mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction were compared using the χ2 test.

resultsFrom 2004 to 2011, 18,696 mastectomy procedures among 18,085 women were identified, with immediate reconstruction in 10,836 procedures (58%). The incidence of SSI within 180 days following mastectomy with or without reconstruction was 8.1% (1,520 of 18,696). In total, 49% of SSIs were identified within 30 days post-mastectomy, 24.5% were identified 31-60 days post-mastectomy, 10.5% were identified 61-90 days post-mastectomy, and 15.7% were identified 91-180 days post-mastectomy. The incidences of SSI were 5.0% (395 of 7,860) after mastectomy only, 10.3% (848 of 8,217) after mastectomy plus implant, 10.7% (207 of 1,942) after mastectomy plus flap, and 10.3% (70 of 677) after mastectomy plus flap and implant (P<.001). The SSI risk was higher after bilateral compared with unilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (11.4% vs 9.4%, P=.001) than without (6.1% vs 4.7%, P=.021) immediate reconstruction.

conclusionsSSI incidence was twice that after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction than after mastectomy alone. Only 49% of SSIs were coded within 30 days after operation. Our results suggest that stratification by procedure type facilitates comparison of SSI rates after breast operations between facilities.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAdolescentAdultBreast ImplantsFemaleHumansIncidenceInsurance, HealthInternational Classification of DiseasesMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsSurgical Wound InfectionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26036877
PMCPMC4693606
OpenAlexW2309815074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.