Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036861›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2015

A comprehensive scoping review of ability and disability in ADHD using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY).

Elles de Schipper, Aiko Lundequist, Anna Löfgren Wilteus, David Coghill, Petrus J de Vries, Mats Granlund, Martin Holtmann, Ulf Jonsson, Sunil Karande, Florence Levy and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Child Sheehan Disability Scale in adolescent psychiatric patients.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Elles de SchipperPaediatric Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Stockholm, Sweden.
Aiko Lundequist
Anna Löfgren Wilteus
David Coghill
Petrus J de Vries
Mats Granlund
Martin Holtmann
Ulf Jonsson
Sunil Karande
Florence Levy
Omar Al-Modayfer
Luis Rohde
Rosemary Tannock
Bruce Tonge
Sven Bölte
Stockholm Health Care Services · SEHospital for Sick Children · CAJönköping University · SEKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INLWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm · DEMonash University · AUNeuroDevelopment Center · USStockholm County Council · SEUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Dundee · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first in a series of four empirical investigations to develop International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The objective here was to use a comprehensive scoping review approach to identify the concepts of functional ability and disability used in the scientific ADHD literature and link these to the nomenclature of the ICF-CY. Systematic searches were conducted using Medline/PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and Cinahl, to extract the relevant concepts of functional ability and disability from the identified outcome studies of ADHD. These concepts were then linked to ICF-CY by two independent researchers using a standardized linking procedure. Data from identified studies were analysed until saturation of ICF-CY categories was reached. Eighty studies were included in the final analysis. Concepts contained in these studies were linked to 128 ICF-CY categories. Of these categories, 68 were considered to be particularly relevant to ADHD (i.e., identified in at least 5 % of the studies). Of these, 32 were related to Activities and participation, 31 were related to Body functions, and five were related to environmental factors. The five most frequently identified categories were school education (53 %), energy and drive functions (50 %), psychomotor functions (50 %), attention functions (49 %), and emotional functions (45 %). The broad variety of ICF-CY categories identified in this study underlines the necessity to consider ability and disability in ADHD across all dimensions of life, for which the ICF-CY provides a valuable and universally applicable framework. These results, in combination with three additional preparatory studies (expert survey, focus groups, clinical study), will provide a scientific basis to define the ICF Core Sets for ADHD for multi-purpose use in basic and applied research, and every day clinical practice.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26036861
OpenAlexW584615620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.