Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036819›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2015

Programmed death-1 checkpoint blockade in acute myeloid leukemia.

Alison Sehgal, Theresa L Whiteside, Michael Boyiadzis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Put in a "CaCells · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is There a Place for PD-1-PD-L Blockade in Acute Myeloid Leukemia?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Cutting Edge Molecular Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison SehgalUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology , 5150 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 , USA.
Theresa L Whiteside
Michael Boyiadzis
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Restoring anti-tumor immunity in the microenvironment of head and neck cancerR01CA168628 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITESIDE, THERESA L. · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168628PHS HHS R0ICA168628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmune checkpoints are regulatory pathways induced in activated T lymphocytes that regulate antigen responsiveness. These immune checkpoints are hijacked by tumors to promote dysfunction of anti-tumor effector cells and consequently of tumor escape from the host immune system. AREAS COVERED: Programmed death-1/programmed death ligand (PD-1/PDL-1), a checkpoint pathway, has been extensively investigated in leukemia mouse models. Expression of PD-1 on the surface of activated immune cells and of its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, on leukemic blasts has been documented. Clinical trials with PD-1 inhibitors in patients with hematological malignancies are ongoing with promising clinical responses. EXPERT OPINION: Therapy of hematological cancers with antibodies blocking inhibitory receptors is expected to be highly clinically effective. Checkpoint inhibitory receptors and their ligands are co-expressed on hematopoietic cells found in the leukemic milieu. Several distinct immunological mechanisms are likely to be engaged by antibody-based checkpoint blockade. Co-expression of multiple inhibitory receptors on hematopoietic cells offers an opportunity for combining blocking antibodies to achieve more effective therapy. Up-regulation of receptor/ligand expression in the leukemic milieu may provide a blood marker predictive of response. Finally, chemotherapy-induced up-regulation of PD-1 on T cells after conventional leukemia therapy creates a solid rationale for application of checkpoint blockade as a follow-up therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenGenes, cdcHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorT-LymphocytesTumor EscapeUp-RegulationAntibodiesAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoracute myeloid leukemiacheckpoint inhibitionimmunotherapyprogrammed death-1

Identifiers

PMID26036819
PMCPMC4778424
OpenAlexW1916138910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.