Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036693›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2015

The histology of Nanomia bijuga (Hydrozoa: Siphonophora).

Samuel H Church, Stefan Siebert, Pathikrit Bhattacharyya, Casey W Dunn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How colonial animals evolve.Science advances · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The histology of Nanomia bijuga (Hydrozoa: Siphonophora).Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel H ChurchDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Stefan SiebertDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Pathikrit BhattacharyyaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Casey W DunnDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The siphonophore Nanomia bijuga is a pelagic hydrozoan (Cnidaria) with complex morphological organization. Each siphonophore is made up of many asexually produced, genetically identical zooids that are functionally specialized and morphologically distinct. These zooids predominantly arise by budding in two growth zones, and are arranged in precise patterns. This study describes the cellular anatomy of several zooid types, the stem, and the gas-filled float, called the pneumatophore. The distribution of cellular morphologies across zooid types enhances our understanding of zooid function. The unique absorptive cells in the palpon, for example, indicate specialized intracellular digestive processing in this zooid type. Though cnidarians are usually thought of as mono-epithelial, we characterize at least two cellular populations in this species which are not connected to a basement membrane. This work provides a greater understanding of epithelial diversity within the cnidarians, and will be a foundation for future studies on N. bijuga, including functional assays and gene expression analyses.

Indexed as

AnimalsHydrozoaNervous System

Identifiers

PMID26036693
PMCPMC5032985
OpenAlexW2951275130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.