Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036605›Full record

SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2016

Indication for cataract surgery. Do we have evidence of who will benefit from surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Line Kessel, Jens Andresen, Ditte Erngaard, Per Flesner, Britta Tendal, Jesper Hjortdal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03992807 (Patient-centered and Economic Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Patients With Age-related Cataract), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03992807 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Patient-centered and Economic Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Patients With Age-related Cataract: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled773ConditionsAge-related CataractArmsA patient decision aid, A usual education booklet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Visual Acuity Outcomes after Phacoemulsification in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity before Cataract Surgery.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Line KesselDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jens AndresenSkanderborg Eye Clinic, Skanderborg, Denmark.
Ditte ErngaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Per FlesnerOdense Eye Clinic, Odense, Denmark.
Britta TendalDanish Health and Medicines Authorities, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper HjortdalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital NBG, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for cataract surgery is expected to rise dramatically in the future due to the increasing proportion of elderly citizens and increasing demands for optimum visual function. The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the indication of cataract surgery based on which group of patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases. Studies evaluating the outcome after cataract surgery according to preoperative visual acuity and visual complaints were included in a meta-analysis. We identified eight observational studies comparing outcome after cataract surgery in patients with poor (<20/40) and fair (>20/40) preoperative visual acuity. We could not find any studies that compared outcome after cataract surgery in patients with few or many preoperative visual complaints. A meta-analysis showed that the outcome of cataract surgery, evaluated as objective and subjective visual improvement, was independent on preoperative visual acuity. There is a lack of scientific evidence to guide the clinician in deciding which patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. To overcome this shortage of evidence, many systems have been developed internationally to prioritize patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery, but the Swedish NIKE (Nationell Indikationsmodell för Katarakt Ekstraktion) is the only system where an association to the preoperative scoring of a patient has been related to outcome of cataract surgery. We advise that clinicians are inspired by the NIKE system when they decide which patients to operate to ensure that surgery is only offered to patients who are expected to benefit from cataract surgery.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionCataractHumansRisk AssessmentVision DisordersVisual Acuitycataractevidenceindicationvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID26036605
PMCPMC4744664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.