Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036466›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

Randomized phase II study of S-1 dosing schedule for resected colorectal cancer.

Chu Matsuda, Mamoru Uemura, Ken Nakata, Tatsushi Shingai, Junichi Nishimura, Taishi Hata, Masakazu Ikenaga, Ichiro Takemasa, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Takeshi Kato and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chu MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Mamoru UemuraDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ken NakataDepartment of Surgery, Sakai City Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsushi ShingaiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi NishimuraDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Taishi HataDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masakazu IkenagaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsunekazu MizushimaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takeshi KatoDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Masataka IkedaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki OhueDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Kohei MurataDepartment of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi HasegawaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Taroh SatohDepartment of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Hirofumi YamamotoDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. hyamamoto@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Mitsugu SekimotoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Riichiro NezuDepartment of Surgery, Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III Colorectal cancer (CRC) is now internationally accepted as standard care for improving patient outcomes. The Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Colorectal Cancer (ACTS-CC) confirmed the non-inferiority of S-1 to tegafur/urcail/leucovorin in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage III CRC after curative surgery. However, the 6-month completion rate of S-1 treatment was 76.5% in the ACTS-CC. Therefore, treatment completion remains an unresolved problem. METHODS/

designA randomized phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral daily administration and alternate-day administration of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in curatively resected stage III CRC. Enrolled patients were assigned to either S-1 daily administration (Arm A) or alternate-day S-1 administration (Arm B). Assigned treatment will start within 8 weeks after surgery. In both arms, S-1 dosing (oral) will be based on body surface area (80 mg/day for body surface area<1.25 m2, 100 mg/day for 1.25-1.5 m2, or 60 mg/day for >1.5 m2). In Arm A, S-1 will be administered orally for 28 days, followed by a 14-day rest. Administration will be conducted for 24 weeks from the date of therapy start. In Arm B, S-1 will be administered orally on alternate days for 28 weeks from the date of the start of therapy. After treatment, all patients will be observed without additional therapy unless recurrent lesions or other cancer lesions occur. The primary endpoint is treatment completion rate. Secondary endpoints include 3-year disease-free survival, compliance, and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Previously, S-1 alternate-day intake maintained the efficacy of chemotherapy while reducing adverse effects for patients with R0-resected stage II/III gastric cancer. Improvement of chemotherapy completion rate for patients with colorectal cancer will lead to an improved patient prognosis. Therefore, a randomized phase II trial has been designed to examine the efficacy of alternate-day versus current standard daily S-1 administration as adjuvant chemotherapy for R0-resected stage III colorectal cancer.

trial registrationThis study was registered on 18 February 2014 with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000013185.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBody Surface AreaChemotherapy, AdjuvantColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsDrug Dosage CalculationsHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

PMID26036466
PMCPMC4470361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.