Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036257›Full record

Trial reportItalian journal of pediatrics2015

Flavor, relative palatability and components of cow's milk hydrolysed formulas and amino acid-based formula.

Michele Miraglia Del Giudice, Enza D'Auria, Diego Peroni, Samuele Palazzo, Giovanni Radaelli, Pasquale Comberiati, Francesca Galdo, Nunzia Maiello, Enrica Riva

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review to Reassess the Formula for Early Life Growth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Hypoallergenicity assessment of an extensively hydrolyzed whey-protein formula in cow's milk allergic infants.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michele Miraglia Del GiudiceDepartment of Pediatrics, II University of Naples, via De Crecchio 4, 80138, Napoli, Italy. michele.miraglia@unina2.it.
Enza D'AuriaDepartment of Pediatrics, San Paolo Hospital-University of Milan, Via A di Rudinì 8, I-20142, Milan, Italy. dauria.e@email.it.
Diego PeroniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Verona, Policlinico Borgo, Roma, Verona, Italy. perodiego@gmail.com.
Samuele PalazzoDepartment of Pediatrics, San Paolo Hospital-University of Milan, Via A di Rudinì 8, I-20142, Milan, Italy. samuele.palazzo@fastwebnet.it.
Giovanni RadaelliDepartment of Pediatrics, San Paolo Hospital-University of Milan, Via A di Rudinì 8, I-20142, Milan, Italy. giovanni.radaelli@unimi.it.
Pasquale ComberiatiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Verona, Policlinico Borgo, Roma, Verona, Italy. pasquale.comberiati@gmail.com.
Francesca GaldoDepartment of Pediatrics, II University of Naples, via De Crecchio 4, 80138, Napoli, Italy. galdofrancesca@gmail.com.
Nunzia MaielloDepartment of Pediatrics, II University of Naples, via De Crecchio 4, 80138, Napoli, Italy. nunziamaiello@libero.it.
Enrica RivaDepartment of Pediatrics, San Paolo Hospital-University of Milan, Via A di Rudinì 8, I-20142, Milan, Italy. enrica.riva@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth extensively hydrolysed formulas (eHF) and amino acid-based formula (AAFs) have been demonstrated effective for the treatment of CMA. However, in clinical practice, parents complain that hydrolysates are rejected by children due to their bad taste. Flavor of hydrolysed formulas has been poorly investigated although it affects the acceptance of milk over all the other attributes. The aim of the present study was to understand the factors underlying the unpleasant flavor of hydrolysed 25 formulas and amino acid-based formula. SUBJECTS AND

methodsOne hundred and fifty trained panelists performed a randomized-double-blind test with different milks. The smell, texture, taste and aftertaste of each formula were evaluated on a scale ranging from -2 (worst) to 2 (best).

resultsFormulas showed significant difference, as compared to cow's milk, in smell, texture, taste and aftertaste. Overall, whey eHFs were judged of better palatability than casein eHF and the AAFs (p < 0.05). Whey eHF showed significant differences among them for sensory attributes, especially for taste and aftertaste.

conclusionsThese results suggest that a broad range of flavor exists among the hydrolysed formulas. Further studies, adequately designed to investigate the relationship between milks' flavor and nutrient profile of hydrolysed formulas are warranted.

Indexed as

TasteAcid-Base EquilibriumAdultAmino AcidsAnimalsCattleDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornMaleMilkMilk HypersensitivityProtein HydrolysatesAmino AcidsProtein Hydrolysates

Identifiers

PMID26036257
PMCPMC4474460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.