Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26036228›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2016

Preoperative INR and postoperative major bleeding and mortality: A retrospective cohort study.

Hani Tamim, Mohamad Habbal, Antoine Saliba, Khaled Musallam, Muhyeddine Al-Taki, Jamal Hoballah, Sarah Jamali, Ali Taher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A retrospective chart analysis with 5-year follow-up of early care for geriatric hip fracture patients: why we should continue talking about hip fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. The Relationship Between Preoperative International Normalized Ratio and Postoperative Major Bleeding in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic Value of an Integrated Coagulation Score in Ischemic Stroke After Endovascular Therapy: A retrospective case series.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hani TamimDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon. htamim@aub.edu.lb.
Mohamad HabbalFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. mmh89@hotmail.com.
Antoine SalibaDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon. ans11@aub.edu.lb.
Khaled MusallamDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon. kmm06@aub.edu.lb.
Muhyeddine Al-TakiDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. maltaki@aub.edu.lb.
Jamal HoballahDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. jh34@aub.edu.lb.
Sarah JamaliFaculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. sfj01@aub.edu.lb.
Ali TaherDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, 11072020, Lebanon. ataher@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little research has been done on the current cut-off international normalized ratio (INR) value of 1.5 for patients undergoing surgery. The objectives of this study are to assess the association between INR and postoperative major bleeding and mortality in patients undergoing surgery and to identify an ideal pre-operative INR for surgical patients. We analyzed data from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2008 and 2011 (636,231 patients). The primary outcomes were major bleeding and mortality at 30 days postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to assess these associations. Compared to an INR of <1, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for major bleeding was 1.22 (95 % CI 1.18-1.25) for INR 1-1.49, 1.48 (95 % CI 1.40-1.56) for INR 1.5-1.9, and 1.49 (95 % CI 1.39-1.60) for INR ≥2. The aOR for mortality at 30 days post-operation compared to INR of <1 was 1.51 (95 % CI 1.41-1.62), 2.31 (95 % CI 2.12-2.52), and 2.81 (95 % CI 2.56-3.10) for INR 1-1.49, 1.5-1.9, and ≥2, respectively. The ideal pre-operative INR value to predict an increased risk for major bleeding was 1.10 and 1.13 for mortality. In conclusion, preoperative INR is significantly and independently associated with postoperative major bleeding and mortality.

Indexed as

International Normalized RatioAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative HemorrhagePreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesACS NSQIPHemostasisINROutcomesProthrombin timeSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.