Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26035896›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2016

Couples' Social Careers in Assisted Living: Reconciling Individual and Shared Situations.

Candace L Kemp, Mary M Ball, Molly M Perkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experience of Conjugality Among Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Social Networks in an Assisted Living Community: Correlates of Acquaintance and Companionship Ties Among Residents.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Candace L KempThe Gerontology Institute and Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta. ckemp@gsu.edu.
Mary M BallDivision of General and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wesley Woods Health Center at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Molly M PerkinsDivision of General and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wesley Woods Health Center at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Atlanta Site, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Georgia.

Funding

Negotiating Social Relationships in Assisted Living: The Resident ExperienceR01AG030486 · NIA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BALL, MARY M · 2008 to 2010
$884k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyDespite important connections between relationships, health, and well-being, little is known about later-life couples' daily lives and experiences, especially those who are frail. Our aim was to advance knowledge by gaining an in-depth understanding of married and unmarried couples' intimate and social relationships in assisted living (AL) and by generating an explanatory theory. DESIGN AND

methodsUsing Grounded Theory Methods, we build on past research and analyze qualitative data from a 3-year mixed-methods study set in eight diverse AL settings located in the state of Georgia. Data collection included participant observation and informal and formal interviews yielding information on 29 couples, 26 married and 3 unmarried.

resultsDefined by their relationships with one another and those around them, couples' experiences were variable and involved a process of reconciling individual and shared situations. Analysis affirms and expands an existing typology of couples in AL. Our conceptual model illustrates the multilevel factors influencing the reconciliation process and leading to variation. Findings highlight the strengths and burdens of late-life couplehood and have implications for understanding these intimate ties beyond AL. IMPLICATIONS: Intimate and social relationships remain significant in later life. Strategies aimed at supporting couples should focus on individual and shared situations, particularly as couples' experience physical and cognitive decline across time.

Indexed as

Assisted Living FacilitiesInterpersonal RelationsMarriageSpousesAgedAged, 80 and overFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGeorgiaGrounded TheoryHumansLong-Term CareMaleQualitative ResearchResidence CharacteristicsAssisted living facilitiesCouplesIntimate relationshipsLong-term careQualitative analysis: Grounded TheorySocial relationships

Identifiers

PMID26035896
PMCPMC5019042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.