Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26035895›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2016

"Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.

Lauren R Bangerter, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Allison R Heid, Katherine Abbott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A Meta-Synthesis Study of Person-Centered Care Experience from the Perspective of Nursing Home Residents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Aged care residents' prioritization of care: A mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Person-directed care planning in nursing homes: A scoping review.International journal of older people nursing · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren R BangerterDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. lrb207@psu.edu.
Kimberly Van HaitsmaThe College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Allison R HeidThe New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford.
Katherine AbbottThe Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.

Funding

Assessing preferences for everyday living in the nursing home: reliability and coR21NR011334 · NINR · POLISHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VANHAITSMA, KIMBERLY S · 2011 to 2012
$448k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyAssessing and honoring older adults' preferences is a fundamental step in providing person-centered care in long-term care facilities. Researchers and practitioners have begun to develop measures to assess nursing home (NH) residents' everyday preferences. However, little is known about how residents interpret and conceptualize their preferences and what specific clinical response may be needed to balance health and safety concerns with preferences. DESIGN AND

methodsWe used content analysis to examine interview responses on a subset of eight open-ended items from the Preferences of Every-day Living Inventory for Nursing Home (PELI-NH) residents with 337 NH residents (mean age 81). We considered how residents self-define various preferences of care and the associated importance of these preferences.

resultsResidents identified preferences for interpersonal interactions (greetings, staff showing care, and staff showing respect), coping strategies, personal care (bathroom needs, setting up bedding), and healthcare discussions. Respondents highlighted specific qualities and characteristics about care interactions that are necessary to fully meeting their everyday preferences. IMPLICATIONS: Results contribute to an emergent body of research that utilizes patient preferences to achieve the goals of person-centered care. The complexity of these responses substantiates the use of qualitative inquiry to thoroughly assess and integrate NH resident preferences into the delivery of person-centered care.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsLong-Term CareNursing HomesPatient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchLong-term careNursing homesPerson-centered carePreferences

Identifiers

PMID26035895
PMCPMC4944536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.