Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26035801›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2015

The cost-effectiveness of routine testing for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer in the United States: corrected estimates.

Scott D Grosse, Glenn E Palomaki, Mercy Mvundura, Heather Hampel

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome in the United States.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Epidemiology matters: peering inside the "black box" in economic evaluations of genetic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Glenn E PalomakiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women and Infants Hospital/Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Mercy MvunduraProgram on Appropriate Technology in Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000000277119558
Heather HampelDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEarly Detection of CancerGenetic TestingHumans

Identifiers

PMID26035801
PMCPMC4511954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.