Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034817›Full record

ArticleACS nano2015

Gated Luminescence Imaging of Silicon Nanoparticles.

Jinmyoung Joo, Xiangyou Liu, Venkata Ramana Kotamraju, Erkki Ruoslahti, Yoonkey Nam, Michael J Sailor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Peptide CAQK: Properties, Applications, and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Modification of Porous Silicon with an Amphiphilic Quaternary Ammonium Hydrocarbon for Nanomedicine Applications.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Development of Time-Resolved Luminescence Measurement Instruments for Biosensing and Bioimaging - An Overview.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The In Vivo Toxicity Assessments of Water-Dispersed Fluorescent Silicon Nanoparticles inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Understanding the mechanisms of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Porous Silicon Nanoparticles Embedded in Poly(lactic-Advanced functional materials · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces.Nature reviews. Materials · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinmyoung Joo†Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, mc 0358, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.
Xiangyou Liu‡Cancer Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Venkata Ramana Kotamraju‡Cancer Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Erkki Ruoslahti‡Cancer Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Yoonkey Nam∥Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 305-701, Korea.
Michael J Sailor†Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, mc 0358, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.

Funding

Tumor Penetrating Peptides for Cancer TargetingR01CA152327 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI RUOSLAHTI, ERKKI · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA152327NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The luminescence lifetime of nanocrystalline silicon is typically on the order of microseconds, significantly longer than the nanosecond lifetimes exhibited by fluorescent molecules naturally present in cells and tissues. Time-gated imaging, where the image is acquired at a time after termination of an excitation pulse, allows discrimination of a silicon nanoparticle probe from these endogenous signals. Because of the microsecond time scale for silicon emission, time-gated imaging is relatively simple to implement for this biocompatible and nontoxic probe. Here a time-gated system with ∼10 ns resolution is described, using an intensified CCD camera and pulsed LED or laser excitation sources. The method is demonstrated by tracking the fate of mesoporous silicon nanoparticles containing the tumor-targeting peptide iRGD, administered by retro-orbital injection into live mice. Imaging of such systemically administered nanoparticles in vivo is particularly challenging because of the low concentration of probe in the targeted tissues and relatively high background signals from tissue autofluorescence. Contrast improvements of >100-fold (relative to steady-state imaging) is demonstrated in the targeted tissues.

Indexed as

LuminescenceAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoparticlesSiliconSiliconbioimagingcancerintravital imagingin vivo imagingiRGDporous silicontargeting peptidestime-gated luminescence imagingtumor

Identifiers

PMID26034817
PMCPMC4931905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.