Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034779›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2015

Activation of latent human immunodeficiency virus by the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat: a pilot study to assess effects on the central nervous system.

Thomas A Rasmussen, Martin Tolstrup, Holger Jon Møller, Christel R Brinkmann, Rikke Olesen, Christian Erikstrup, Alex L Laursen, Lars Østergaard, Ole S Søgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. HIV Latency in Myeloid Cells: Challenges for a Cure.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Contributions of Clinical Pharmacology to HIV Cure Research.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas A RasmussenDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Martin TolstrupDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Holger Jon MøllerClinical Biochemistry.
Christel R BrinkmannDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Rikke OlesenDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Christian ErikstrupClinical Immunology , Aarhus University Hospital , Denmark.
Alex L LaursenDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Lars ØstergaardDepartments of Infectious Diseases.
Ole S SøgaardDepartments of Infectious Diseases.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a substudy of a clinical trial, we assessed whether activation of latent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat had detrimental effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Adults infected with HIV received oral panobinostat 20 mg 3 times per week every other week for 8 weeks. In cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we assayed panobinostat concentration, HIV RNA, and the level of neuroinflammatory or degenerative biomarkers in 11 individuals before and during study therapy. Neither panobinostat nor HIV RNA was detected in CSF. In addition, there was no change from baseline in CSF biomarkers. Thus, panobinostat administration was not associated with CNS adverse effects as assessed by CSF biomarkers.

Indexed as

central nervous systemcerebrospinal fluidhistone deacetylase inhibitorshuman immunodeficiency viruspanobinostat

Identifiers

PMID26034779
PMCPMC4438909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.