Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034690›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Population, diversity and characteristics of cellulolytic microorganisms from the Indo-Burma Biodiversity hotspot.

Sailendra Goyari, Shantibala S Devi, Mohan C Kalita, Narayan C Talukdar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sailendra GoyariInstitute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal, India.
Shantibala S DeviInstitute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal, India.
Mohan C KalitaGauhati University, Guwahati, India.
Narayan C TalukdarInstitute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), Imphal, India.
Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development · INGauhati University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest ecosystem harbour a large number of biotic components where cellulolytic microorganisms participate actively in the biotransformation of dead and decaying organic matter and soil nutrient cycling. This study explores the aerobic culturable cellulolytic microorganisms in the forest soils of North East India. Soil samples rich in dead and decaying organic matter were collected from eight conserved forests during the season when microbes were found to be most active. Cellulolytic microorganisms were isolated using selective media in which cellulose was the sole carbon source. Population of culturable, aerobic, cellulolytic microorganisms were found to be higher at the incubation temperature that corresponds to the natural ambient temperature of the site of sample collection. Bacterial population was higher in all of the sites than fungal population. Bacterial population ranged from 1.91 × 10(5) to 3.35 × 10(6) CFU g(-1) dry soil while actinomycetes and fungal population ranged from 9.13 × 10(2) to 3.46 × 10(4) CFU g(-1) dry soil and 9.36 × 10(2) to 4.31 × 10(4) CFU g(-1) dry soil, respectively. It was observed that though many isolates showed activity on the CMC plate assay, very few isolates showed significant filter paper activity. Three cellulolytic fungal isolates showing high FPase activity were characterised, identified and submitted to GenBank as Talaromyces verruculosus SGMNPf3 (KC937053), Trichoderma gamsii SGSPf7 (KC937055) and Trichoderma atroviride SGBMf4 (KC937054).

Indexed as

Cellulolytic microorganismsCMC plate assayForest soilFPase activityMicrobial population

Identifiers

PMID26034690
PMCPMC4447715
OpenAlexW2151479103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.